Path monitoring vs BGP

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Please sign in to see details of an important advisory in our Customer Advisories area.

Path monitoring vs BGP

L1 Bithead

Hey community,

We have a dual ISP environment, when one is used as a backup if the primary line stops working.

I'm wondering what would be the best approach to configure HA in this situation (on the VR). I did it with path monitoring as it seems much simpler and straight forward. But can't decide if BGP is the better option for this scenario.

 

Thanks!

1 REPLY 1

L5 Sessionator

BGP would be simple in this scenario if you only care about outbound traffic. Take the default from both ISP and set the local preference on your primary higher than 100. You would want an import filter that only matches the default to protect in case the ISP does something silly.

You probably already have the necessary NAT rules if you have it working with path monitoring.

I find BGP to be more predictable with failover and failback.

 

  • 302 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!