<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AIOPS inaccurately reports on QUIC BPA Block in AIOps for NGFW Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/aiops-for-ngfw-discussions/aiops-inaccurately-reports-on-quic-bpa-block/m-p/533808#M343</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I want to use an APP group so I don't have 2+ rules doing the same thing. AIOPS should be able to parse it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 16:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JoshuaBowers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-09T16:48:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AIOPS inaccurately reports on QUIC BPA Block</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/aiops-for-ngfw-discussions/aiops-inaccurately-reports-on-quic-bpa-block/m-p/533780#M340</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I blocked QUIC within panorama shared policy last week. AIOPS still recommends blocking QUIC. How do I get AIOPS to recognize that we are blocking QUIC with an App group? I can't create a ticket as the ticket platform keeps shoving me to the LIVE community. I don't think anyone here is able to help as this seems like a parsing issue on AIOPS.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 14:52:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/aiops-for-ngfw-discussions/aiops-inaccurately-reports-on-quic-bpa-block/m-p/533780#M340</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaBowers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-09T14:52:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AIOPS inaccurately reports on QUIC BPA Block</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/aiops-for-ngfw-discussions/aiops-inaccurately-reports-on-quic-bpa-block/m-p/533807#M342</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Seems like the AIOPS QUIC blocking check is pretty explicit, that a rule is first in list and has application quic. It likely doesn't match on it being in an app group, or further down the list. When I added a quic block rule, it reported as unresolved until i moved it to the top of the other allow rules&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;'It is recommended to have a security rule with application = 'quic' and action != 'allow' &lt;STRONG&gt;before any allow rules&lt;/STRONG&gt; to ensure encrypted traffic is decrypted and inspected'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am also keen to understand the Palo Alto support model for AIOPS. Even though we have the 'Free' version, you have to spend a lot of money on the firewalls themselves to get it, so not really free, some support would be nice.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 16:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/aiops-for-ngfw-discussions/aiops-inaccurately-reports-on-quic-bpa-block/m-p/533807#M342</guid>
      <dc:creator>Grant_Peterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-09T16:46:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AIOPS inaccurately reports on QUIC BPA Block</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/aiops-for-ngfw-discussions/aiops-inaccurately-reports-on-quic-bpa-block/m-p/533808#M343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I want to use an APP group so I don't have 2+ rules doing the same thing. AIOPS should be able to parse it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 16:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/aiops-for-ngfw-discussions/aiops-inaccurately-reports-on-quic-bpa-block/m-p/533808#M343</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaBowers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-09T16:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AIOPS inaccurately reports on QUIC BPA Block</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/aiops-for-ngfw-discussions/aiops-inaccurately-reports-on-quic-bpa-block/m-p/533809#M344</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have similar issues with the Malicious URLs EDL recommendation, where if I use my own EDL with exceptions it doesn't meet the BPA recommendation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 16:55:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/aiops-for-ngfw-discussions/aiops-inaccurately-reports-on-quic-bpa-block/m-p/533809#M344</guid>
      <dc:creator>Grant_Peterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-09T16:55:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

