<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Understanding the Agent Security Problem in AI Runtime Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/ai-runtime-discussions/understanding-the-agent-security-problem/m-p/1247916#M3</link>
    <description>&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;I&gt;OpenClaw (previously Moltbot previously Clawdbot) kind of highlighted a &lt;/I&gt;&lt;I&gt;prominent problem with AI agents&amp;nbsp;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;I&gt;. The more autonomy these systems have, the more insecure they tend to be. &lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR aria-hidden="true" /&gt;&lt;I&gt;And then came Moltbook and it was not entirely difficult to see through the hype, but it mirrors a multi-agent ecosystem within an enterprise. So what does that mean for the Agent Security problem? We &lt;/I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/blog/network-security/the-moltbook-case-and-how-we-need-to-think-about-agent-security/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-sk="tooltip_parent"&gt;introduced a simple but robust framing&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;I&gt; to the problem and called it the IBC framework. &lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR aria-hidden="true" /&gt;&lt;I&gt;Agent Security = Identity x Operating Boundaries x Context Integrity. &lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR aria-hidden="true" /&gt;&lt;I&gt; &lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR aria-hidden="true" /&gt;&lt;I&gt;Does this framing help in understanding the size and scale of the Agent Security problem?&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 06:45:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>saimishra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-11T06:45:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding the Agent Security Problem</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/ai-runtime-discussions/understanding-the-agent-security-problem/m-p/1247916#M3</link>
      <description>&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;I&gt;OpenClaw (previously Moltbot previously Clawdbot) kind of highlighted a &lt;/I&gt;&lt;I&gt;prominent problem with AI agents&amp;nbsp;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;I&gt;. The more autonomy these systems have, the more insecure they tend to be. &lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR aria-hidden="true" /&gt;&lt;I&gt;And then came Moltbook and it was not entirely difficult to see through the hype, but it mirrors a multi-agent ecosystem within an enterprise. So what does that mean for the Agent Security problem? We &lt;/I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/blog/network-security/the-moltbook-case-and-how-we-need-to-think-about-agent-security/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-sk="tooltip_parent"&gt;introduced a simple but robust framing&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;I&gt; to the problem and called it the IBC framework. &lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR aria-hidden="true" /&gt;&lt;I&gt;Agent Security = Identity x Operating Boundaries x Context Integrity. &lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR aria-hidden="true" /&gt;&lt;I&gt; &lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR aria-hidden="true" /&gt;&lt;I&gt;Does this framing help in understanding the size and scale of the Agent Security problem?&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 06:45:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/ai-runtime-discussions/understanding-the-agent-security-problem/m-p/1247916#M3</guid>
      <dc:creator>saimishra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-11T06:45:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

