<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: East west traffic in transit gateway with vpn attachment with firewall... in VM-Series in the Public Cloud</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/east-west-traffic-in-transit-gateway-with-vpn-attachment-with/m-p/381520#M1106</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You have two options.&amp;nbsp; You can either use BGP to prepend the routes from one of the firewalls to create essentially an Active/Passive routing hierarchy or use SNAT.&amp;nbsp; The former is generally preferred.&amp;nbsp; We have this documented in our AWS Reference Architecture here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/resources/reference-architectures/aws" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/resources/reference-architectures/aws&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:04:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jmeurer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-22T13:04:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>East west traffic in transit gateway with vpn attachment with firewall...</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/east-west-traffic-in-transit-gateway-with-vpn-attachment-with/m-p/381441#M1105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i am deploying two vm firewall in different AZ of same VPC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will configure VPN attachment with firewall for east west and outbound&amp;nbsp; traffic to be scanned by firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My concern is for the return traffic of east west from the vm firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The outbound traffic will pass with vpn attachment but how the return traffic will flow?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 06:48:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/east-west-traffic-in-transit-gateway-with-vpn-attachment-with/m-p/381441#M1105</guid>
      <dc:creator>omprasadax</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-22T06:48:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: East west traffic in transit gateway with vpn attachment with firewall...</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/east-west-traffic-in-transit-gateway-with-vpn-attachment-with/m-p/381520#M1106</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You have two options.&amp;nbsp; You can either use BGP to prepend the routes from one of the firewalls to create essentially an Active/Passive routing hierarchy or use SNAT.&amp;nbsp; The former is generally preferred.&amp;nbsp; We have this documented in our AWS Reference Architecture here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/resources/reference-architectures/aws" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/resources/reference-architectures/aws&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:04:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/east-west-traffic-in-transit-gateway-with-vpn-attachment-with/m-p/381520#M1106</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmeurer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-22T13:04:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

