<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BGP on a dhcp interface, on a palo alto in VM-Series in the Public Cloud</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/bgp-on-a-dhcp-interface-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/542073#M1887</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Update:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;i updated to 10.2.3 from 10.1.9 and the commit its now working&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but the peer bgp status is not established since the local id is 0.0.0.0 (from runtime stats) Any help someone?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2023 09:49:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GabrielMontiel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-14T09:49:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BGP on a dhcp interface, on a palo alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/bgp-on-a-dhcp-interface-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/541315#M1880</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV data-reddit-rtjson="{&amp;quot;entityMap&amp;quot;:{},&amp;quot;blocks&amp;quot;:[{&amp;quot;key&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;f73ca&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Im having thoughts that it should be possible but not being able to, because the routed daemon is thinking that the DHCP interface has more IPs than 1 then you have to specify IP address on the BGP local address and that would kill the configuration&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;type&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;unstyled&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;depth&amp;quot;:0,&amp;quot;inlineStyleRanges&amp;quot;:[],&amp;quot;entityRanges&amp;quot;:[],&amp;quot;data&amp;quot;:{}}]}"&gt;
&lt;DIV data-reddit-rtjson="{&amp;quot;entityMap&amp;quot;:{},&amp;quot;blocks&amp;quot;:[{&amp;quot;key&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;f73ca&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Im having thoughts that it should be possible but not being able to, because the routed daemon is thinking that the DHCP interface has more IPs than 1 then you have to specify IP address on the BGP local address and that would kill the configuration&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;type&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;unstyled&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;depth&amp;quot;:0,&amp;quot;inlineStyleRanges&amp;quot;:[],&amp;quot;entityRanges&amp;quot;:[],&amp;quot;data&amp;quot;:{}}]}"&gt;
&lt;DIV data-reddit-rtjson="{&amp;quot;entityMap&amp;quot;:{},&amp;quot;blocks&amp;quot;:[{&amp;quot;key&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;f73ca&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Im having thoughts that it should be possible but not being able to, because the routed daemon is thinking that the DHCP interface has more IPs than 1 then you have to specify IP address on the BGP local address and that would kill the configuration&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;type&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;unstyled&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;depth&amp;quot;:0,&amp;quot;inlineStyleRanges&amp;quot;:[],&amp;quot;entityRanges&amp;quot;:[],&amp;quot;data&amp;quot;:{}}]}"&gt;
&lt;DIV data-reddit-rtjson="{&amp;quot;entityMap&amp;quot;:{},&amp;quot;blocks&amp;quot;:[{&amp;quot;key&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;f73ca&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Im having thoughts that it should be possible but not being able to, because the routed daemon is thinking that the DHCP interface has more IPs than 1 then you have to specify IP address on the BGP local address and that would kill the configuration&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;type&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;unstyled&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;depth&amp;quot;:0,&amp;quot;inlineStyleRanges&amp;quot;:[],&amp;quot;entityRanges&amp;quot;:[],&amp;quot;data&amp;quot;:{}}]}"&gt;Is it possible to configure BGP on a panorama template with the bgp local address on a dhcp interface without specifying the address? since if i have to specify the address the configuration would not be viable&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2023 10:45:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/bgp-on-a-dhcp-interface-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/541315#M1880</guid>
      <dc:creator>GabrielMontiel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-06T10:45:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP on a dhcp interface, on a palo alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/bgp-on-a-dhcp-interface-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/541950#M1885</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/185326"&gt;@GabrielMontiel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have several Firewalls where I am running BGP peers over interfaces with DHCP assigned IP addresses. Unfortunately, this is all configured locally without Templates, however looking into BGP configuration documentation, I do not see a reason why this should not work by using Panorama Template:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PavelK_0-1683864257628.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/50142i27606DE1555BAC37/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="PavelK_0-1683864257628.png" alt="PavelK_0-1683864257628.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you select in Template local interface that is defined in the template as DHCP interface, then it should automatically populate local IP address as none, then after you pushed the configuration to Firewall, you should be able to see the IP address from runtime stats, then use that IP address as a target for neighboring BGP peer device to establish a session.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pavel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 04:09:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/bgp-on-a-dhcp-interface-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/541950#M1885</guid>
      <dc:creator>PavelK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-12T04:09:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP on a dhcp interface, on a palo alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/bgp-on-a-dhcp-interface-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/542062#M1886</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know it should be possible&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thats why i opened this thread i get a routed error "You have to specify an ip address because the interface has more than one"&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Maybe it is a bug?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2023 04:41:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/bgp-on-a-dhcp-interface-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/542062#M1886</guid>
      <dc:creator>GabrielMontiel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-14T04:41:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP on a dhcp interface, on a palo alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/bgp-on-a-dhcp-interface-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/542073#M1887</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Update:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;i updated to 10.2.3 from 10.1.9 and the commit its now working&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but the peer bgp status is not established since the local id is 0.0.0.0 (from runtime stats) Any help someone?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2023 09:49:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/bgp-on-a-dhcp-interface-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/542073#M1887</guid>
      <dc:creator>GabrielMontiel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-14T09:49:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

