<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Palo VM with AWS VPC Peering in VM-Series in the Public Cloud</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/palo-vm-with-aws-vpc-peering/m-p/548427#M1920</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/298430"&gt;@SuhaimiMohd&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, it will work. However general recommendetion is to use Transit Gateway (TGW) instead of VPC peering, mainly becaue TGW provides you with great scalability if you need to add more VPCs in the future. You may want to compare the cost of TGW vs VPC peering, as I don't know the numbers right now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 15:21:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aleksandar.astardzhiev</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-06T15:21:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Palo VM with AWS VPC Peering</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/palo-vm-with-aws-vpc-peering/m-p/546346#M1912</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have an AWS setup that contains 3 vpcs namely vpc1, vpc2 and vpc3. We intend to configure VPC Peering using Hub and Spoke (Centralized) configuration such that vpc2 will be the hub and vpc1 and vpc3 the spokes. Placement of the VM Firewall will in the hub and in a HA configuration,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Will this VPC peering setup work? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="SuhaimiMohd_0-1687146750507.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/50978iD5F93FE7C1C365B3/image-size/medium/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="SuhaimiMohd_0-1687146750507.png" alt="SuhaimiMohd_0-1687146750507.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 03:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/palo-vm-with-aws-vpc-peering/m-p/546346#M1912</guid>
      <dc:creator>SuhaimiMohd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-19T03:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo VM with AWS VPC Peering</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/palo-vm-with-aws-vpc-peering/m-p/548427#M1920</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/298430"&gt;@SuhaimiMohd&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, it will work. However general recommendetion is to use Transit Gateway (TGW) instead of VPC peering, mainly becaue TGW provides you with great scalability if you need to add more VPCs in the future. You may want to compare the cost of TGW vs VPC peering, as I don't know the numbers right now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 15:21:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/palo-vm-with-aws-vpc-peering/m-p/548427#M1920</guid>
      <dc:creator>aleksandar.astardzhiev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-06T15:21:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

