<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic AWS GWLB  integration with Palo VM and PBF to tunnel interface in VM-Series in the Public Cloud</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/aws-gwlb-integration-with-palo-vm-and-pbf-to-tunnel-interface/m-p/552639#M1942</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;AWS Palo VM can&amp;nbsp; integrate fine with AWS GWLB. It can receive GENEVE packet on eth0 and overlay route to untrust interface to reach internet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;when we try to steer the 80 and 443 traffic to a tunnel on that Palo VM for proxy inspection, our packets are not leaving tunnel interface on the firewall. TAC found its a bug .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does any one able to achieve this ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Exact same setup with PA VM in aws without GWLB integration works fine.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 17:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MuraliMani</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-08-04T17:52:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AWS GWLB  integration with Palo VM and PBF to tunnel interface</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/aws-gwlb-integration-with-palo-vm-and-pbf-to-tunnel-interface/m-p/552639#M1942</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;AWS Palo VM can&amp;nbsp; integrate fine with AWS GWLB. It can receive GENEVE packet on eth0 and overlay route to untrust interface to reach internet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;when we try to steer the 80 and 443 traffic to a tunnel on that Palo VM for proxy inspection, our packets are not leaving tunnel interface on the firewall. TAC found its a bug .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does any one able to achieve this ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Exact same setup with PA VM in aws without GWLB integration works fine.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 17:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/aws-gwlb-integration-with-palo-vm-and-pbf-to-tunnel-interface/m-p/552639#M1942</guid>
      <dc:creator>MuraliMani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-04T17:52:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWS GWLB  integration with Palo VM and PBF to tunnel interface</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/aws-gwlb-integration-with-palo-vm-and-pbf-to-tunnel-interface/m-p/554682#M1958</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;PBF issue fixed with latest update 10.2.5.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:36:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/aws-gwlb-integration-with-palo-vm-and-pbf-to-tunnel-interface/m-p/554682#M1958</guid>
      <dc:creator>MuraliMani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-22T12:36:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

