https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/aws-auto-scaling-template-version-2-0/m-p/192146#M203 <P>Hi Stacy,</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>We didn't want to have an auto scaling solution that has an upper limit based on something that has nothing to do with when to scale (EIPs).&nbsp; We recommend using Panorama for management which negates the need for public IPs altogether.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Warby</P> Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:18:09 GMT Warby 2017-12-18T21:18:09Z https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/aws-auto-scaling-template-version-2-0/m-p/192145#M202 <P>I am trying to go through the Auto-Scaling Template for VM on AWS 2.0.&nbsp; I have a few question around the template.&nbsp;</P><OL><LI>Is there a reason that we are using a NAT gateway?&nbsp; Are we going to support a EIP on the Management interface so that we don't need to deploy a bastion host (jump box).&nbsp;</LI><LI>Are we going to support multiple more than two AZ's in future releases?</LI></OL><P>Thanks,</P><P>Stacy</P> Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:14:50 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/aws-auto-scaling-template-version-2-0/m-p/192145#M202 svacca 2017-12-18T21:14:50Z https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/aws-auto-scaling-template-version-2-0/m-p/192146#M203 <P>Hi Stacy,</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>We didn't want to have an auto scaling solution that has an upper limit based on something that has nothing to do with when to scale (EIPs).&nbsp; We recommend using Panorama for management which negates the need for public IPs altogether.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Warby</P> Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:18:09 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/aws-auto-scaling-template-version-2-0/m-p/192146#M203 Warby 2017-12-18T21:18:09Z