<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Palo Alto VM series deployment in Azure Cloud in VM-Series in the Public Cloud</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/palo-alto-vm-series-deployment-in-azure-cloud/m-p/615006#M2288</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are planning to deploy two VM series firewalls in our Azure landing zone. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In our case, Palo Alto firewall is like a data center firewall and we have a Fortigate in the perimeter.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;All outbound traffic from cloud servers will hit the Palo Alto first and then move to the Fortigate and then to the internet.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;All inbound traffic to cloud servers should hit the Fortigate first and then move to the Palo Alto and then to the cloud server.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Public IPs will be present on the Fortigate and not on the Palo Alto&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When I checked the design options I have seen 2 options as given below.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Active/Passive&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Good for config sync and session sync. But I read people mentioning about the longer failover time.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Standalone deployment with load balancers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;No config sync or session sync&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Requires Panorama for configuration management&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Faster failover time.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which one should I choose?. I would like to know which option is mostly deployed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 19:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KunhipockerShabeebEdu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-10-25T19:57:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Palo Alto VM series deployment in Azure Cloud</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/palo-alto-vm-series-deployment-in-azure-cloud/m-p/615006#M2288</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are planning to deploy two VM series firewalls in our Azure landing zone. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In our case, Palo Alto firewall is like a data center firewall and we have a Fortigate in the perimeter.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;All outbound traffic from cloud servers will hit the Palo Alto first and then move to the Fortigate and then to the internet.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;All inbound traffic to cloud servers should hit the Fortigate first and then move to the Palo Alto and then to the cloud server.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Public IPs will be present on the Fortigate and not on the Palo Alto&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When I checked the design options I have seen 2 options as given below.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Active/Passive&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Good for config sync and session sync. But I read people mentioning about the longer failover time.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Standalone deployment with load balancers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;No config sync or session sync&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Requires Panorama for configuration management&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Faster failover time.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which one should I choose?. I would like to know which option is mostly deployed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 19:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/palo-alto-vm-series-deployment-in-azure-cloud/m-p/615006#M2288</guid>
      <dc:creator>KunhipockerShabeebEdu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-25T19:57:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto VM series deployment in Azure Cloud</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/palo-alto-vm-series-deployment-in-azure-cloud/m-p/615208#M2289</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any update guys?.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 18:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/palo-alto-vm-series-deployment-in-azure-cloud/m-p/615208#M2289</guid>
      <dc:creator>KunhipockerShabeebEdu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-26T18:03:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

