<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic GCP IPsec VPN HA in VM-Series in the Public Cloud</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/gcp-ipsec-vpn-ha/m-p/344621#M930</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know how to establish a redundant IPsec VPN connection to a redundant VM-500 (not cluster) deployed in GCP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should we use GCP Load balancer with external IP and load balance to a single PAN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If so the GCP network LB does not perform DNAT to the Palo Alto so the PAN will receive the public IP as destination in IP packet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If VPN session is setup outbound then GCP will NAT to different public IP, how to solve that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should we connect directly to the NIC0 public IP instead? We need to use NAT-T?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Someone here has best practices on this topic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:55:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvindehaas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-08-19T19:55:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GCP IPsec VPN HA</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/gcp-ipsec-vpn-ha/m-p/344621#M930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know how to establish a redundant IPsec VPN connection to a redundant VM-500 (not cluster) deployed in GCP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should we use GCP Load balancer with external IP and load balance to a single PAN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If so the GCP network LB does not perform DNAT to the Palo Alto so the PAN will receive the public IP as destination in IP packet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If VPN session is setup outbound then GCP will NAT to different public IP, how to solve that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should we connect directly to the NIC0 public IP instead? We need to use NAT-T?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Someone here has best practices on this topic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:55:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/vm-series-in-the-public-cloud/gcp-ipsec-vpn-ha/m-p/344621#M930</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvindehaas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-19T19:55:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

