<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Question from Playbook Optimization webinar: Sub-Playbook in Cortex XSOAR Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/cortex-xsoar-discussions/question-from-playbook-optimization-webinar-sub-playbook/m-p/494632#M897</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have heard from a support member that it's bad practice to go more than on sub-playbook team, ie don't have subplaybooks within subplaybooks. Can you clarify?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;LI-PRODUCT title="Cortex XSOAR" id="Cortex_XSOAR"&gt;&lt;/LI-PRODUCT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 10:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rtsedaka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-05-30T10:00:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question from Playbook Optimization webinar: Sub-Playbook</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/cortex-xsoar-discussions/question-from-playbook-optimization-webinar-sub-playbook/m-p/494632#M897</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have heard from a support member that it's bad practice to go more than on sub-playbook team, ie don't have subplaybooks within subplaybooks. Can you clarify?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;LI-PRODUCT title="Cortex XSOAR" id="Cortex_XSOAR"&gt;&lt;/LI-PRODUCT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 10:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/cortex-xsoar-discussions/question-from-playbook-optimization-webinar-sub-playbook/m-p/494632#M897</guid>
      <dc:creator>rtsedaka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-30T10:00:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question from Playbook Optimization webinar: Sub-Playbook</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/cortex-xsoar-discussions/question-from-playbook-optimization-webinar-sub-playbook/m-p/494633#M898</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Reply by: &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/152916"&gt;@RahulVijaydev&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The context under which this was suggested may have dictated the suggestion, however, it is certainly not bad practice to use nested sub-playbooks, especially when you need to encapsulate logic that you expect will be repeated. Nested playbooks are ubiquitous in out of the box content i.e content produced by XSOAR&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 17:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/cortex-xsoar-discussions/question-from-playbook-optimization-webinar-sub-playbook/m-p/494633#M898</guid>
      <dc:creator>rtsedaka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-31T17:13:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

