<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Unable to negate Signature pattern-match. Why Custom Vulnerability has Negate option but Apps NOT? in Custom Signatures</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/custom-signatures/unable-to-negate-signature-pattern-match-why-custom/m-p/256260#M296</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I created custom app for ldaps tcp/636 based on signature (ssl-rsp-certificate) which contains text from certificate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This caused https - tcp/443 (ssl based) traffic to match this new custom app.&lt;BR /&gt;After some investigation I realised that https context ssl-req-client-hello contains http/version (i.e. http/1.1) and wanted to filter out this in my custom app so it will not match https any more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I run into limitation where I am not able to Negate my pattern-match. Something that is possible in Custom vulnerability is not possible in Custom App, unfortunately and sadly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Proposal to specify port 636 under Advanced/Defaults is not a solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reason: Custom application signature behaves similar way as pre-defined. App-ID does not work merely on default port information but also other conditions.&lt;BR /&gt;For example, if you have web-application running on custom port, it will be identify as web-browsing as soon as it matches to web-browsing signatures.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 09:14:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>olukacko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-05T09:14:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unable to negate Signature pattern-match. Why Custom Vulnerability has Negate option but Apps NOT?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/custom-signatures/unable-to-negate-signature-pattern-match-why-custom/m-p/256260#M296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I created custom app for ldaps tcp/636 based on signature (ssl-rsp-certificate) which contains text from certificate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This caused https - tcp/443 (ssl based) traffic to match this new custom app.&lt;BR /&gt;After some investigation I realised that https context ssl-req-client-hello contains http/version (i.e. http/1.1) and wanted to filter out this in my custom app so it will not match https any more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I run into limitation where I am not able to Negate my pattern-match. Something that is possible in Custom vulnerability is not possible in Custom App, unfortunately and sadly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Proposal to specify port 636 under Advanced/Defaults is not a solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reason: Custom application signature behaves similar way as pre-defined. App-ID does not work merely on default port information but also other conditions.&lt;BR /&gt;For example, if you have web-application running on custom port, it will be identify as web-browsing as soon as it matches to web-browsing signatures.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 09:14:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/custom-signatures/unable-to-negate-signature-pattern-match-why-custom/m-p/256260#M296</guid>
      <dc:creator>olukacko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-05T09:14:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

