<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Custom Threat is being identified, but not taking the correct action. in Custom Signatures</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/custom-signatures/custom-threat-is-being-identified-but-not-taking-the-correct/m-p/288813#M321</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a custom vulnerability for Datanyze Scraping that is being idenfied but only alerting.&amp;nbsp; This signature looks for http-req-headers and dns-req-headers for the value of Datanyze.&amp;nbsp; This is working great, I can see the traffic in the threat log so I know it is being properly identified.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The configuration of the signature has it set as Severity: Medium, Default Action: Reset Both, Direction: Both and Affected System:&amp;nbsp; Client-and-server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked the policies where the traffic is coming in on and it has the correct vulnerability profile.&amp;nbsp; Note that on the profile we have criticals - mediums set to do a reset-both.&amp;nbsp; We also are not using app-id on this policy but traditional 80/443 service ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea why this would be happening?&amp;nbsp; My next step is a support ticket but would like to figure this one out on my own.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tom.mccomb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-17T15:55:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Custom Threat is being identified, but not taking the correct action.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/custom-signatures/custom-threat-is-being-identified-but-not-taking-the-correct/m-p/288813#M321</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a custom vulnerability for Datanyze Scraping that is being idenfied but only alerting.&amp;nbsp; This signature looks for http-req-headers and dns-req-headers for the value of Datanyze.&amp;nbsp; This is working great, I can see the traffic in the threat log so I know it is being properly identified.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The configuration of the signature has it set as Severity: Medium, Default Action: Reset Both, Direction: Both and Affected System:&amp;nbsp; Client-and-server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked the policies where the traffic is coming in on and it has the correct vulnerability profile.&amp;nbsp; Note that on the profile we have criticals - mediums set to do a reset-both.&amp;nbsp; We also are not using app-id on this policy but traditional 80/443 service ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea why this would be happening?&amp;nbsp; My next step is a support ticket but would like to figure this one out on my own.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/custom-signatures/custom-threat-is-being-identified-but-not-taking-the-correct/m-p/288813#M321</guid>
      <dc:creator>tom.mccomb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-17T15:55:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

