<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Rule consolidation in Expedition in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/rule-consolidation-in-expedition/m-p/248614#M1097</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Theose same features are also available in Expedition:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Filters --&amp;gt; Merge --&amp;gt; Policies --&amp;gt; Chose either NAT or Security&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 23:50:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sjanita</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-02T23:50:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Rule consolidation in Expedition</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/rule-consolidation-in-expedition/m-p/248453#M1096</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Using MT3, there was a nice working feature for quickly finding rules with the same sources/destinations etc. see below.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="consolidation.PNG" style="width: 209px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/18558i6827A3B798B192EA/image-size/small/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=200" role="button" title="consolidation.PNG" alt="consolidation.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to obtain similar querries on the Expedition tool on the Security rulebase (not for objects, services etc), but am failing in it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- There are some predefined filters: Invalid Services, Duplicate values on "Services....", Duplicate value on "Address, Address groups on vsys1. But they're not the same or as exclusive as above.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-building a filter expression: Source - equal.recursive =&amp;gt; would only filter on text "", which is leading to ANY sources.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does anyone has a solution in Expedition for filtering out rules with fi. the same (destinations + services) defined?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Filip&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 13:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/rule-consolidation-in-expedition/m-p/248453#M1096</guid>
      <dc:creator>FilipElsen.Proximus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-01T13:19:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rule consolidation in Expedition</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/rule-consolidation-in-expedition/m-p/248614#M1097</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Theose same features are also available in Expedition:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Filters --&amp;gt; Merge --&amp;gt; Policies --&amp;gt; Chose either NAT or Security&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 23:50:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/rule-consolidation-in-expedition/m-p/248614#M1097</guid>
      <dc:creator>sjanita</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-02T23:50:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rule consolidation in Expedition</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/rule-consolidation-in-expedition/m-p/248672#M1098</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the update.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know the existance of this field, but ever since I've been hitting the button "ANALYSE", which doesn't do a thing at all.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In fact, you just need to hit the arrow next to it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Glad that I've found it back &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="merge.png" style="width: 209px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/18576i5CCB21E39E6F9FD7/image-dimensions/209x106/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2" width="209" height="106" role="button" title="merge.png" alt="merge.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 08:41:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/rule-consolidation-in-expedition/m-p/248672#M1098</guid>
      <dc:creator>FilipElsen.Proximus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-04T08:41:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rule consolidation in Expedition</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/rule-consolidation-in-expedition/m-p/355374#M3037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, helped me achieve something late on a Friday evening, much appreciated:)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:23:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/rule-consolidation-in-expedition/m-p/355374#M3037</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndrewKemmyNTT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-09T07:23:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

