topic Migrating of Local Rules that use Panorama defined shared Security Profiles. in Expedition Discussions https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/migrating-of-local-rules-that-use-panorama-defined-shared/m-p/250515#M1179 <P>We are trying to use Expedition to help migrate our local Palo configuratons to Panorama for a more centralized management of the firewalls.&nbsp; What we have noticed when exporting the configurations from Expedition into Panorama, that the device rules that&nbsp;use Security Profiles that are defined within Panorama do not carry over.&nbsp; &nbsp;The rule no longer has any Security Profile associated with it.&nbsp; Has anyone else had this issue or does anyone know a work around for getting shared profiles to carry over&nbsp;into the XML export?</P> Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:04:29 GMT Chad_Parrish 2019-02-19T23:04:29Z Migrating of Local Rules that use Panorama defined shared Security Profiles. https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/migrating-of-local-rules-that-use-panorama-defined-shared/m-p/250515#M1179 <P>We are trying to use Expedition to help migrate our local Palo configuratons to Panorama for a more centralized management of the firewalls.&nbsp; What we have noticed when exporting the configurations from Expedition into Panorama, that the device rules that&nbsp;use Security Profiles that are defined within Panorama do not carry over.&nbsp; &nbsp;The rule no longer has any Security Profile associated with it.&nbsp; Has anyone else had this issue or does anyone know a work around for getting shared profiles to carry over&nbsp;into the XML export?</P> Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:04:29 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/migrating-of-local-rules-that-use-panorama-defined-shared/m-p/250515#M1179 Chad_Parrish 2019-02-19T23:04:29Z