<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Check Point R80.10 import / show package in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/check-point-r80-10-import-show-package/m-p/269125#M1674</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I checked and the file is indeed incorrectly formatted to JSON standards, but after running the export again, and then again on a completly other R80.10 management server, I found those were also incorrectly formatted to the standards -and hence would be 'normal'... Are you willing to take a look at it? I know the feature is in beta though.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:15:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arne-VDH</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-12T11:15:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Check Point R80.10 import / show package</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/check-point-r80-10-import-show-package/m-p/268195#M1672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Has anyone managed to get a R80.10 import completed based on the show package output?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've got the import of the address objects/services/.. but only the global access policy layer seems to get imported. They are present if I look at the contents of the json/html files inside of the package though. If I try to import the .json rulebase using the R80 import tab it reads a syntax error, malformed JSON. Any known tricks to get the others imported as well?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2019 15:45:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/check-point-r80-10-import-show-package/m-p/268195#M1672</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne-VDH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-09T15:45:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Check Point R80.10 import / show package</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/check-point-r80-10-import-show-package/m-p/268989#M1673</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;to verify and debug the json format of the file you can open it using firefox. If there is a json formatting error with the file firefox usually will provide the line and character location(s) of the characters causing the json format to be considered invalid.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:26:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/check-point-r80-10-import-show-package/m-p/268989#M1673</guid>
      <dc:creator>sjanita</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-11T21:26:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Check Point R80.10 import / show package</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/check-point-r80-10-import-show-package/m-p/269125#M1674</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I checked and the file is indeed incorrectly formatted to JSON standards, but after running the export again, and then again on a completly other R80.10 management server, I found those were also incorrectly formatted to the standards -and hence would be 'normal'... Are you willing to take a look at it? I know the feature is in beta though.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:15:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/check-point-r80-10-import-show-package/m-p/269125#M1674</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne-VDH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-12T11:15:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

