<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Unused objects actually used by NAT in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-objects-actually-used-by-nat/m-p/296794#M2122</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Updated to the latest version and still the same problem!&amp;nbsp; any help would be great!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 18:20:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tony_Kiser</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-06T18:20:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unused objects actually used by NAT</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-objects-actually-used-by-nat/m-p/292885#M2067</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using Expedition to remove unused objects from firewalls via a partial config import.&amp;nbsp; What I ran into is the tool removed an unknown number of objects that, while not used by a security policy, they are in fact used by a NAT policy!&amp;nbsp; Because of this I was only able to import services, service groups, and address groups.&amp;nbsp; Importing the new, "smaller" address list won't allow a commit because of the NAT policies that are pointing to objects that Expedition removed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Has anyone else seen this, or have any info on why this is happening?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:34:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-objects-actually-used-by-nat/m-p/292885#M2067</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tony_Kiser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-14T15:34:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused objects actually used by NAT</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-objects-actually-used-by-nat/m-p/293029#M2069</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Which version of Expedition are you using?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Would it be possible to share the configuration with us via fwmigrate email to verify the causes for this issue?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:21:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-objects-actually-used-by-nat/m-p/293029#M2069</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgildelaig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-15T08:21:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused objects actually used by NAT</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-objects-actually-used-by-nat/m-p/293148#M2075</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just updated, but was at 1.1.35.&amp;nbsp; is that e-mail fwmigrate@paloaltonetworks dot com?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:19:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-objects-actually-used-by-nat/m-p/293148#M2075</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tony_Kiser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-16T14:19:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused objects actually used by NAT</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-objects-actually-used-by-nat/m-p/296794#M2122</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Updated to the latest version and still the same problem!&amp;nbsp; any help would be great!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 18:20:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-objects-actually-used-by-nat/m-p/296794#M2122</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tony_Kiser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-06T18:20:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

