<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Address Range Invalid with Expedition Upgrade in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/address-range-invalid-with-expedition-upgrade/m-p/314479#M2365</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I upgraded Expedition to version 1.1.59 and it's telling me that all of my address objects, that are set to "ip ranges", are invalid.&amp;nbsp; They aren't invalid.&amp;nbsp; I can add them to my Palo Alto firewall in the same format without issue.&amp;nbsp; I'm unable to add address objects using the "ip range" selection.&amp;nbsp; I imported a Cisco ASA config.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 22:59:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RonCarmack</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-03-04T22:59:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Address Range Invalid with Expedition Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/address-range-invalid-with-expedition-upgrade/m-p/314479#M2365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I upgraded Expedition to version 1.1.59 and it's telling me that all of my address objects, that are set to "ip ranges", are invalid.&amp;nbsp; They aren't invalid.&amp;nbsp; I can add them to my Palo Alto firewall in the same format without issue.&amp;nbsp; I'm unable to add address objects using the "ip range" selection.&amp;nbsp; I imported a Cisco ASA config.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 22:59:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/address-range-invalid-with-expedition-upgrade/m-p/314479#M2365</guid>
      <dc:creator>RonCarmack</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-04T22:59:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Address Range Invalid with Expedition Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/address-range-invalid-with-expedition-upgrade/m-p/314538#M2372</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;A id="link_3" class="lia-link-navigation lia-page-link lia-user-name-link" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/127947" target="_self"&gt;Rcarmack1970&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;I am able to reproduce the issue as you mentioned, have escalated to developer , will get back to you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;Lynn&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 23:01:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/address-range-invalid-with-expedition-upgrade/m-p/314538#M2372</guid>
      <dc:creator>lychiang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-04T23:01:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Address Range Invalid with Expedition Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/address-range-invalid-with-expedition-upgrade/m-p/315235#M2382</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for pointing this out.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think this should be now corrected in 1.1.60, which we released on Thursday afternoon CET time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have been improving the validity controls on address objects to support IPv6, fqdn and others, and my fault, I introduced one issue when controlling the ipv4-ipv6 range.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 08:16:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/address-range-invalid-with-expedition-upgrade/m-p/315235#M2382</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgildelaig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-09T08:16:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Address Range Invalid with Expedition Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/address-range-invalid-with-expedition-upgrade/m-p/315273#M2385</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, I upgraded to 1.1.60 and the addresses look good now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 15:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/address-range-invalid-with-expedition-upgrade/m-p/315273#M2385</guid>
      <dc:creator>RonCarmack</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-09T15:07:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

