<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Panorama objects to be used in a local firewall config through expedition in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/panorama-objects-to-be-used-in-a-local-firewall-config-through/m-p/322121#M2480</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In a somewhat unusual case I'm trying to use objects pushed through Panorama, in a policy in expedition. Both Panorama and the firewall are linked &amp;amp; imported in the expedition project.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Moving the firewall policy to an all Panorama policy isn't an option here (yet). Is there a way I can use a Panorama object (already present on the firewall) and use it in local policies through expedition (or the find/replace functionality)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:29:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arne-VDH</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-10T12:29:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Panorama objects to be used in a local firewall config through expedition</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/panorama-objects-to-be-used-in-a-local-firewall-config-through/m-p/322121#M2480</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In a somewhat unusual case I'm trying to use objects pushed through Panorama, in a policy in expedition. Both Panorama and the firewall are linked &amp;amp; imported in the expedition project.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Moving the firewall policy to an all Panorama policy isn't an option here (yet). Is there a way I can use a Panorama object (already present on the firewall) and use it in local policies through expedition (or the find/replace functionality)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:29:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/panorama-objects-to-be-used-in-a-local-firewall-config-through/m-p/322121#M2480</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne-VDH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-10T12:29:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Panorama objects to be used in a local firewall config through expedition</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/panorama-objects-to-be-used-in-a-local-firewall-config-through/m-p/322650#M2491</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the current FW policy is using the object, the object should appear in Expedition when importing the configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This would be one of our called "ghost" objects.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We identify those objects if we see them used in the configuration but not being declared (as it is the Panorama push config the one declaring the object).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One trick would be to create a disabled rule using the object, or an object group using that object in the FW, and when importing the configuration into Expedition, those objects would show up.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We do not directly go to the Panorama configuration to see which are the objects that may have been pushed to the NGFW.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:56:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/panorama-objects-to-be-used-in-a-local-firewall-config-through/m-p/322650#M2491</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgildelaig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-14T10:56:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

