<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Basic Workflow Questions in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/basic-workflow-questions/m-p/324290#M2523</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Migrating four Checkpoint clusters into single Panorama/HA firewall pair. My initial thought was to tackle each Checkpoint cluster as it's own project (good/bad idea? not sure how projects fit into overall workflow). Running 1.1.66.2 if it matters.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I was able to import Checkpoints and Panorama base config. I needed to provide rules to someone else for review prior to implementation, did a merge into Panorama then export security rules from Panorama into CSV. This all worked as expected. Now I need to go back to original Checkpoint configs to fix zone names and network interfaces, but the original Checkpoint configs are no longer visible. Makes some sense after a merge.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Should I tackle this as a single project? Think of a project as a client?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Do the original source files need to have everything resolved (address objects, zones, interfaces, etc) prior to a merge? Is there a way to go back to fix something in source configuration after a merge, then merge again?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Akeakamai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-22T16:37:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Basic Workflow Questions</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/basic-workflow-questions/m-p/324290#M2523</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Migrating four Checkpoint clusters into single Panorama/HA firewall pair. My initial thought was to tackle each Checkpoint cluster as it's own project (good/bad idea? not sure how projects fit into overall workflow). Running 1.1.66.2 if it matters.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I was able to import Checkpoints and Panorama base config. I needed to provide rules to someone else for review prior to implementation, did a merge into Panorama then export security rules from Panorama into CSV. This all worked as expected. Now I need to go back to original Checkpoint configs to fix zone names and network interfaces, but the original Checkpoint configs are no longer visible. Makes some sense after a merge.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Should I tackle this as a single project? Think of a project as a client?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Do the original source files need to have everything resolved (address objects, zones, interfaces, etc) prior to a merge? Is there a way to go back to fix something in source configuration after a merge, then merge again?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/basic-workflow-questions/m-p/324290#M2523</guid>
      <dc:creator>Akeakamai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-22T16:37:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basic Workflow Questions</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/basic-workflow-questions/m-p/324297#M2525</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is better to resolve the different parts on each source, to help you focus on each context, but you can also do the different resolutions now on your Panorama source.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As you merged the Checkpoint configuration into the Panorama configuration, now you should be able to see those objects in your Panorama source.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Proceed from there&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:47:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/basic-workflow-questions/m-p/324297#M2525</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgildelaig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-22T16:47:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

