https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/lacp-disabled/m-p/333555#M2684 <P>I have been looking this option over within the expedition tool and do not see an option for LACP, so I do not believe expedition will make any changes at that level ( and the default would be off if it is not touched ). So if you are performing a migration we would not migrate this portion of the config, we also do not migrate any routing protocol outside of static routes.</P> Mon, 15 Jun 2020 23:16:23 GMT azuniga 2020-06-15T23:16:23Z https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/lacp-disabled/m-p/333518#M2683 <P>Has anyone comes across an issue where LACP is disabled on&nbsp;aggregate interfaces after configuration merge?</P> <P>LACP was enabled on Palo Alto base config and after config was merged with Check Point config LACP was off.</P> Mon, 15 Jun 2020 19:53:24 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/lacp-disabled/m-p/333518#M2683 jb2020 2020-06-15T19:53:24Z https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/lacp-disabled/m-p/333555#M2684 <P>I have been looking this option over within the expedition tool and do not see an option for LACP, so I do not believe expedition will make any changes at that level ( and the default would be off if it is not touched ). So if you are performing a migration we would not migrate this portion of the config, we also do not migrate any routing protocol outside of static routes.</P> Mon, 15 Jun 2020 23:16:23 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/lacp-disabled/m-p/333555#M2684 azuniga 2020-06-15T23:16:23Z