<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic unused address inside address group in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-address-inside-address-group/m-p/335327#M2701</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Can expedition be used to determine which address objects within an address group are unused?&amp;nbsp; For example, if I have an address group that has 1000 address objects, can expedition tell me which of those address objects are not used?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:30:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Blake_Wofford</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-25T15:30:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>unused address inside address group</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-address-inside-address-group/m-p/335327#M2701</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can expedition be used to determine which address objects within an address group are unused?&amp;nbsp; For example, if I have an address group that has 1000 address objects, can expedition tell me which of those address objects are not used?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:30:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-address-inside-address-group/m-p/335327#M2701</guid>
      <dc:creator>Blake_Wofford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-25T15:30:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: unused address inside address group</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-address-inside-address-group/m-p/335349#M2702</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If an address object is being referenced within an address group then it will not deem it to be unused when simply calculating unused objects. However Expedition can help with this when using rule enrichment to make your rules more effective. So the short answer is yes it can ultimately help you make your rules more effective.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-address-inside-address-group/m-p/335349#M2702</guid>
      <dc:creator>azuniga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-25T15:57:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

