<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Unused ASA Services after Expedition import in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-asa-services-after-expedition-import/m-p/413100#M3390</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Team,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is my first time to post a question and this is my first experience with Palo devices.&amp;nbsp; I am running Expedition version 1.1.98.&amp;nbsp; What I am trying to do is take my existing ASA configuration and eventually merge it with a base Palo (9.1) configuration that I will eventually load on a new Palo 820.&amp;nbsp; I created a project, imported my palo base configuration, and imported my ASA configuration via txt.&amp;nbsp; Then I went through and started correcting the invalid and duplicated objects.&amp;nbsp; While there are no more "red" counters in my statistics I am seeing that Expedition has listed all 88 of the services as "unused".&amp;nbsp; Is this normal?&amp;nbsp; I suppose that the services would be replaced by Palo services but since this is my first go around I am not sure.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for your help.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Thom199</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-14T21:31:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unused ASA Services after Expedition import</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-asa-services-after-expedition-import/m-p/413100#M3390</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Team,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is my first time to post a question and this is my first experience with Palo devices.&amp;nbsp; I am running Expedition version 1.1.98.&amp;nbsp; What I am trying to do is take my existing ASA configuration and eventually merge it with a base Palo (9.1) configuration that I will eventually load on a new Palo 820.&amp;nbsp; I created a project, imported my palo base configuration, and imported my ASA configuration via txt.&amp;nbsp; Then I went through and started correcting the invalid and duplicated objects.&amp;nbsp; While there are no more "red" counters in my statistics I am seeing that Expedition has listed all 88 of the services as "unused".&amp;nbsp; Is this normal?&amp;nbsp; I suppose that the services would be replaced by Palo services but since this is my first go around I am not sure.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for your help.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-asa-services-after-expedition-import/m-p/413100#M3390</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thom199</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-14T21:31:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused ASA Services after Expedition import</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-asa-services-after-expedition-import/m-p/415123#M3391</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/184644"&gt;@Thom199&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for reaching out to the community and welcome. Yes it is common to have services as unused as our services are used in multiple areas and are referenced to a single service where if you import a Cisco ASA configuration you might have the same service referenced multiple times using multiple objects. Expanding upon that if you are referencing BGP over TCP 179 you may have 3 services being referenced within your configuration, where as in PAN we reference that as 1 single service so this also helps in cleaning up your firewall I hope that makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is the YouTube video on a Cisco ASA migration that might help you with your migration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD6FJ8WNiIqVez8EBeoyRsnQcKTA5FuZ-" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD6FJ8WNiIqVez8EBeoyRsnQcKTA5FuZ-&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:07:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-asa-services-after-expedition-import/m-p/415123#M3391</guid>
      <dc:creator>azuniga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-24T18:07:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused ASA Services after Expedition import</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-asa-services-after-expedition-import/m-p/416711#M3400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much. &amp;nbsp;Your explanation is very helpful.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 01:58:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-asa-services-after-expedition-import/m-p/416711#M3400</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thom199</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-02T01:58:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

