<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Duplicated NAT Rules in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/duplicated-nat-rules/m-p/466811#M3855</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/50581"&gt;@Lukas.Schmitz&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are not aware of any issues but can look at the configuration if you reach out to us at &lt;A href="mailto:fwmigrate@paloaltonetworks.com" target="_blank"&gt;fwmigrate@paloaltonetworks.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 16:34:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>azuniga</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-18T16:34:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Duplicated NAT Rules</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/duplicated-nat-rules/m-p/466751#M3854</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Guys,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we are in the middle of a Migration from Checkpoint R81.x to Palo Alto. The Auto Zone assignment Feature in the Security Policies is working like a Charm, however it´s not working in the NAT Policies. As soon as we are using this Feature, we don´t have the original 90 NAT Rules. Expedition is showing us roughly 1700 Rules. I get the Point that we can´t have more than 1 Destination Zone configured per NAT Policy and therefore Expedition is creating multiple Policies for it, but i can see that we have many duplicated Policies which were created from Expedition. We are using Expedition in Version 1.2.12. Is there any known Issue in this Version ? Are we doing something wrong ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Kind regards!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 13:35:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/duplicated-nat-rules/m-p/466751#M3854</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lukas.Schmitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-18T13:35:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Duplicated NAT Rules</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/duplicated-nat-rules/m-p/466811#M3855</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/50581"&gt;@Lukas.Schmitz&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are not aware of any issues but can look at the configuration if you reach out to us at &lt;A href="mailto:fwmigrate@paloaltonetworks.com" target="_blank"&gt;fwmigrate@paloaltonetworks.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 16:34:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/duplicated-nat-rules/m-p/466811#M3855</guid>
      <dc:creator>azuniga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-18T16:34:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

