<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Parsing issue for service object names containing NEXT as keyword (Fortinet import) in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/parsing-issue-for-service-object-names-containing-next-as/m-p/509066#M4070</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;After importing my Fortinet config, the service object named POWERNEXT was incomplete and I had to fix the protocol and port by myself.&lt;BR /&gt;I did some tests and found that the parsing process stopped when it found NEXT after an edit keyword. I've tried different keywords used in the xml but only the NEXT in a service object fails.&lt;BR /&gt;Here's an example :&lt;BR /&gt;config firewall service custom&lt;BR /&gt;edit "SET"&lt;BR /&gt;set tcp-portrange 995&lt;BR /&gt;next&lt;BR /&gt;edit "CONFIG"&lt;BR /&gt;set tcp-portrange 996&lt;BR /&gt;next&lt;BR /&gt;edit "END"&lt;BR /&gt;set tcp-portrange 997&lt;BR /&gt;next&lt;BR /&gt;edit "NEXT"&lt;BR /&gt;set tcp-portrange 998&lt;BR /&gt;next&lt;BR /&gt;edit "EDIT"&lt;BR /&gt;set tcp-portrange 999&lt;BR /&gt;next&lt;BR /&gt;end&lt;BR /&gt;After the import, I have to fix manually the settings for the "NEXT" service object. The 4 other services are good.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm using Expedition version&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;1.2.27 - not sure which other version is affected.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LordRouter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-15T12:29:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Parsing issue for service object names containing NEXT as keyword (Fortinet import)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/parsing-issue-for-service-object-names-containing-next-as/m-p/509066#M4070</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;After importing my Fortinet config, the service object named POWERNEXT was incomplete and I had to fix the protocol and port by myself.&lt;BR /&gt;I did some tests and found that the parsing process stopped when it found NEXT after an edit keyword. I've tried different keywords used in the xml but only the NEXT in a service object fails.&lt;BR /&gt;Here's an example :&lt;BR /&gt;config firewall service custom&lt;BR /&gt;edit "SET"&lt;BR /&gt;set tcp-portrange 995&lt;BR /&gt;next&lt;BR /&gt;edit "CONFIG"&lt;BR /&gt;set tcp-portrange 996&lt;BR /&gt;next&lt;BR /&gt;edit "END"&lt;BR /&gt;set tcp-portrange 997&lt;BR /&gt;next&lt;BR /&gt;edit "NEXT"&lt;BR /&gt;set tcp-portrange 998&lt;BR /&gt;next&lt;BR /&gt;edit "EDIT"&lt;BR /&gt;set tcp-portrange 999&lt;BR /&gt;next&lt;BR /&gt;end&lt;BR /&gt;After the import, I have to fix manually the settings for the "NEXT" service object. The 4 other services are good.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm using Expedition version&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;1.2.27 - not sure which other version is affected.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/parsing-issue-for-service-object-names-containing-next-as/m-p/509066#M4070</guid>
      <dc:creator>LordRouter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-15T12:29:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

