https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/changes-to-the-supported-objects-in-expedition-versus-the-old/m-p/229358#M459 <P>Nothing yet. We are doing some research and sometimes is really hard. We like more the aproach to migrate the L4 Rules and do the Learning of the App-id after that based on the LOGS generated by our Platform to dont miss an application....</P> Tue, 04 Sep 2018 09:52:34 GMT alestevez 2018-09-04T09:52:34Z https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/changes-to-the-supported-objects-in-expedition-versus-the-old/m-p/229333#M456 <P>Are there any changes to the supported objects in Expedition versus the old migration tool?</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>I am specifically looking for application aware rules to be migrated to App ID from Checkpoint, Fortinet and Cisco.</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>Thanks!</P> Tue, 04 Sep 2018 05:14:11 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/changes-to-the-supported-objects-in-expedition-versus-the-old/m-p/229333#M456 chtoh82 2018-09-04T05:14:11Z https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/changes-to-the-supported-objects-in-expedition-versus-the-old/m-p/229358#M459 <P>Nothing yet. We are doing some research and sometimes is really hard. We like more the aproach to migrate the L4 Rules and do the Learning of the App-id after that based on the LOGS generated by our Platform to dont miss an application....</P> Tue, 04 Sep 2018 09:52:34 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/changes-to-the-supported-objects-in-expedition-versus-the-old/m-p/229358#M459 alestevez 2018-09-04T09:52:34Z https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/changes-to-the-supported-objects-in-expedition-versus-the-old/m-p/229499#M468 <P>Noted with thanks!</P> Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:49:27 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/changes-to-the-supported-objects-in-expedition-versus-the-old/m-p/229499#M468 chtoh82 2018-09-05T08:49:27Z