<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Any recent updates to cause a /32 mask to get added to set commands for address objects? in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/any-recent-updates-to-cause-a-32-mask-to-get-added-to-set/m-p/573488#M4893</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Just noticed after importing a Check Point migration into a Panorama base config and merging the objects that the set commands for address objects all contain a /32 mask in the address field that did not exist in Check Point. The object &amp;gt; address view in the Expedition project all contain a 32 CIDR.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any recent changes to cause this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:41:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KirkHarvey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-01-18T16:41:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Any recent updates to cause a /32 mask to get added to set commands for address objects?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/any-recent-updates-to-cause-a-32-mask-to-get-added-to-set/m-p/573488#M4893</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just noticed after importing a Check Point migration into a Panorama base config and merging the objects that the set commands for address objects all contain a /32 mask in the address field that did not exist in Check Point. The object &amp;gt; address view in the Expedition project all contain a 32 CIDR.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any recent changes to cause this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:41:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/any-recent-updates-to-cause-a-32-mask-to-get-added-to-set/m-p/573488#M4893</guid>
      <dc:creator>KirkHarvey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-18T16:41:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Any recent updates to cause a /32 mask to get added to set commands for address objects?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/any-recent-updates-to-cause-a-32-mask-to-get-added-to-set/m-p/573641#M4894</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/173131"&gt;@KirkHarvey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for reaching out and apologies for the inconveniences.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please check the new Expedition version we are going to release in a few days. It will include a fix for your described issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 14:43:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/any-recent-updates-to-cause-a-32-mask-to-get-added-to-set/m-p/573641#M4894</guid>
      <dc:creator>dpuigdomenec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-19T14:43:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

