<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Unused obj issue in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-obj-issue/m-p/580480#M4979</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Okay. Is it possible to split the two DGs into different views as a project and force Expedition to analyze the DGs separately?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One solution could be to create 2 project, import the Panorama conf and delete 1 DG. &lt;BR /&gt;There is another and better way?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Charlie80</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-15T08:21:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unused obj issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-obj-issue/m-p/580384#M4976</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've imported a Panorama from xml to help me do a cleanup.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Panorama manage 2 device group called "intranet" and "internet"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I already knew about an unused service "tcp-2222".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This service it's &lt;STRONG&gt;used&lt;/STRONG&gt; on &lt;STRONG&gt;Intranet&lt;/STRONG&gt; but &lt;STRONG&gt;unused&lt;/STRONG&gt; on &lt;STRONG&gt;Internet.&lt;/STRONG&gt; If I set a "unused service" filter on Internet the tcp-2222 doesn't appear.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know that i can found it as duplicate obj but i don't need it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would like to export a report of unused obj that cover the case of "tcp-2222" so the service will not added on the Intranet unused report but included in the internet unused report. It's possible?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:59:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-obj-issue/m-p/580384#M4976</guid>
      <dc:creator>Charlie80</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-14T11:59:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused obj issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-obj-issue/m-p/580440#M4978</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/238781"&gt;@Charlie80&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Expedition only takes into consideration unused objects those ones that are not used in any DG.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In your case as the service is used in one of the DGs it will be showed always as used.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:41:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-obj-issue/m-p/580440#M4978</guid>
      <dc:creator>dpuigdomenec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-14T20:41:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused obj issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-obj-issue/m-p/580480#M4979</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Okay. Is it possible to split the two DGs into different views as a project and force Expedition to analyze the DGs separately?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One solution could be to create 2 project, import the Panorama conf and delete 1 DG. &lt;BR /&gt;There is another and better way?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-obj-issue/m-p/580480#M4979</guid>
      <dc:creator>Charlie80</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-15T08:21:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused obj issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-obj-issue/m-p/580481#M4980</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/238781"&gt;@Charlie80&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can create a project loading the FW configuration. Not based on the DG but on the FWs included in that DG.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If an object is declared but not used on that FW context, then it will be showed as not used.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps and let me know if you have any other question,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:22:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-obj-issue/m-p/580481#M4980</guid>
      <dc:creator>dpuigdomenec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-15T08:22:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused obj issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-obj-issue/m-p/580482#M4981</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah yes. Export not the Panorama Conf but the Fw-Intranet conf and Fw-internet conf in two different prj.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/unused-obj-issue/m-p/580482#M4981</guid>
      <dc:creator>Charlie80</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-15T08:24:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

