<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Static Route Import 1.0.106 in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/static-route-import-1-0-106/m-p/234833#M633</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Would anyone on the dev team, care to comment? There is a problem and a few change requests. I just wanted at least for the problem to be acknowledged so that it can be fixed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:32:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dega</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-10T17:32:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Static Route Import 1.0.106</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/static-route-import-1-0-106/m-p/234571#M625</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So, there are a few problems with&amp;nbsp;Static Route Import 1.0.106&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) Including an interface causes the next hop field to be empty&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) When there is a problem somewhere in my file that is causing the entire file to fail, is there a log of what line it is erroring out on?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) There is no option for Administrative Distance&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4) Cosmetic, but Gateway should be named "NextHop"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 13:53:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/static-route-import-1-0-106/m-p/234571#M625</guid>
      <dc:creator>dega</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-09T13:53:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static Route Import 1.0.106</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/static-route-import-1-0-106/m-p/234833#M633</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Would anyone on the dev team, care to comment? There is a problem and a few change requests. I just wanted at least for the problem to be acknowledged so that it can be fixed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:32:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/static-route-import-1-0-106/m-p/234833#M633</guid>
      <dc:creator>dega</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-10T17:32:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static Route Import 1.0.106</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/static-route-import-1-0-106/m-p/236131#M663</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, Yes we seen the message and we have created the internal tasks to fix them Thanks for the . feedback&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 07:33:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/static-route-import-1-0-106/m-p/236131#M663</guid>
      <dc:creator>alestevez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-19T07:33:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

