<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Inconsistent BPA Results in Expedition Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236854#M706</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;magates, can you please send an email to&amp;nbsp;customersuccesstools@paloaltonetworks.com so we can help troubleshoot your issue?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>anmendoza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-24T15:45:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inconsistent BPA Results</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/235629#M651</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am getting unexpected results with Best Practice Analysis. For instance, Going to&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Best Practice&lt;/EM&gt; &amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Security Polic&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;EM&gt;ies&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;shows red X for all tags and many descriptions, but the majority of my policies have both.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, the adoption diagram shows 0% for High Availability, but I have HA configured to nearly all best practice specifications. Dynamic Updates is similar, shows 60% but I have it configured to complete best practice specs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just wondering if this is user error, a bug, or if BPA is not 100% production ready yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 20:28:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/235629#M651</guid>
      <dc:creator>magates</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-16T20:28:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent BPA Results</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236180#M672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We upgraded the BPA to the latest version 3.6.1 in our Expedition 1.0.107, can you update and try with that to see if still doesnt make sense the output? Thx&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 13:51:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236180#M672</guid>
      <dc:creator>alestevez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-19T13:51:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent BPA Results</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236211#M681</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just updated to 1.0.107, getting the same results.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:46:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236211#M681</guid>
      <dc:creator>magates</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-19T14:46:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent BPA Results</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236212#M682</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you run the BPA after the update and you get same results? What are the ones you think are incorrect? Thx&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:47:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236212#M682</guid>
      <dc:creator>alestevez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-19T14:47:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent BPA Results</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236213#M683</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have; I also created a new project, imported, and ran BPA with same results. The&amp;nbsp;items listed in my original post are incorrect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Additionally, as a test I implemented allowed IP addresses on my management interface, but the check still fails as though it is not implemented.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:54:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236213#M683</guid>
      <dc:creator>magates</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-19T14:54:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent BPA Results</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236222#M684</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Im adding Customer success to check since the BPA is something we cannot change by our own &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; I will update here with the findings&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:59:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236222#M684</guid>
      <dc:creator>alestevez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-19T14:59:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent BPA Results</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236223#M685</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you, I appreciate your assistance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:01:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236223#M685</guid>
      <dc:creator>magates</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-19T15:01:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent BPA Results</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236854#M706</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;magates, can you please send an email to&amp;nbsp;customersuccesstools@paloaltonetworks.com so we can help troubleshoot your issue?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/236854#M706</guid>
      <dc:creator>anmendoza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-24T15:45:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent BPA Results</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/237487#M715</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have the same issue here. Running latest version 1.0.107 with BPA 3.6.1. All policies have tags red x-ed while only four out of 73 policies has no tag.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2018 11:32:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/expedition-discussions/inconsistent-bpa-results/m-p/237487#M715</guid>
      <dc:creator>KlausGroeger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-28T11:32:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

