<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Assign Fixed IP Address to Global Protect Users with ldap+radius in GlobalProtect Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/assign-fixed-ip-address-to-global-protect-users-with-ldap-radius/m-p/465893#M2467</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've tried to assign a static ip address to global protect connection using this kb&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u0000008UkxCAE" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u0000008UkxCAE&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;but it doesn't work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The support says that if we have ldap auth for username/password and radius authentication for 2fa it can't work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this method really can't work, I've set the registry key as explained here&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/globalprotect/4-1/globalprotect-app-new-features/new-features-released-in-gp-agent-4_1/static-ip-address-assignment.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/globalprotect/4-1/globalprotect-app-new-features/new-features-released-in-gp-agent-4_1/static-ip-address-assignment.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But this static ip is defined on the client, so the firewall could have already set this ip to another user.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is correct to define an ip pool different from the network of the static ip address? It seems working but just to know if anyone has done this configuration before.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- ip pool 192.168.100.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- fixed ip address 192.168.101.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- if a user doesn't have the registry key, it will take an address of the pool 192.168.100.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- if a user has the key set, can take the address set in the registry key without having override problem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is that correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:17:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>N2Z2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-15T16:17:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Assign Fixed IP Address to Global Protect Users with ldap+radius</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/assign-fixed-ip-address-to-global-protect-users-with-ldap-radius/m-p/465893#M2467</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've tried to assign a static ip address to global protect connection using this kb&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u0000008UkxCAE" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u0000008UkxCAE&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;but it doesn't work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The support says that if we have ldap auth for username/password and radius authentication for 2fa it can't work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this method really can't work, I've set the registry key as explained here&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/globalprotect/4-1/globalprotect-app-new-features/new-features-released-in-gp-agent-4_1/static-ip-address-assignment.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/globalprotect/4-1/globalprotect-app-new-features/new-features-released-in-gp-agent-4_1/static-ip-address-assignment.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But this static ip is defined on the client, so the firewall could have already set this ip to another user.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is correct to define an ip pool different from the network of the static ip address? It seems working but just to know if anyone has done this configuration before.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- ip pool 192.168.100.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- fixed ip address 192.168.101.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- if a user doesn't have the registry key, it will take an address of the pool 192.168.100.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- if a user has the key set, can take the address set in the registry key without having override problem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is that correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:17:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/assign-fixed-ip-address-to-global-protect-users-with-ldap-radius/m-p/465893#M2467</guid>
      <dc:creator>N2Z2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-15T16:17:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

