<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic LSVPN with PA-450 Spokes 10.1 - active/active or active/passive? in GlobalProtect Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/lsvpn-with-pa-450-spokes-10-1-active-active-or-active-passive/m-p/505191#M2903</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;new to PAN .. at the moment we have to do a concept for failover in branch offices, in the LSVPN context.&lt;BR /&gt;We do have 2 LSVPN Hub Palo Alto FWs in Azure in active/active, where Azure Loadbalancer balances the traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now the question is for "standard design" spoke / branch offices.&lt;BR /&gt;When we do have 2 ISPs in the location, both ISP lines should be used for ISP failover and bandwidth.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Questions..&lt;BR /&gt;1. When having a pair of PA-450 in active-active mode as LSVPN satellite, is the FW througput doubled compared to active/passive?&lt;BR /&gt;2. What is your expirience on LSVPN, spoke PA-450 FW as active/active or active/passive, and why would you recommend the one or the other?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 16:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DusanNovakovic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-21T16:37:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LSVPN with PA-450 Spokes 10.1 - active/active or active/passive?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/lsvpn-with-pa-450-spokes-10-1-active-active-or-active-passive/m-p/505191#M2903</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;new to PAN .. at the moment we have to do a concept for failover in branch offices, in the LSVPN context.&lt;BR /&gt;We do have 2 LSVPN Hub Palo Alto FWs in Azure in active/active, where Azure Loadbalancer balances the traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now the question is for "standard design" spoke / branch offices.&lt;BR /&gt;When we do have 2 ISPs in the location, both ISP lines should be used for ISP failover and bandwidth.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Questions..&lt;BR /&gt;1. When having a pair of PA-450 in active-active mode as LSVPN satellite, is the FW througput doubled compared to active/passive?&lt;BR /&gt;2. What is your expirience on LSVPN, spoke PA-450 FW as active/active or active/passive, and why would you recommend the one or the other?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 16:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/lsvpn-with-pa-450-spokes-10-1-active-active-or-active-passive/m-p/505191#M2903</guid>
      <dc:creator>DusanNovakovic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-21T16:37:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

