<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MFA with hybrid ad (GlobalProtect) in GlobalProtect Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/mfa-with-hybrid-ad-globalprotect/m-p/568081#M4710</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;I would like users to log in via globalprotect to authorize themselves via AzureAD (or only use the second factor from azura), and then the users would be mapped to names enabling permissions to be granted via local AD.&lt;BR /&gt;Have any of you encountered this problem?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 21:02:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Greg00</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-01T21:02:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MFA with hybrid ad (GlobalProtect)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/mfa-with-hybrid-ad-globalprotect/m-p/568081#M4710</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;I would like users to log in via globalprotect to authorize themselves via AzureAD (or only use the second factor from azura), and then the users would be mapped to names enabling permissions to be granted via local AD.&lt;BR /&gt;Have any of you encountered this problem?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 21:02:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/mfa-with-hybrid-ad-globalprotect/m-p/568081#M4710</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg00</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-01T21:02:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

