<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Client vs Clientless for Web Application in GlobalProtect Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/client-vs-clientless-for-web-application/m-p/354324#M472</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;For a browser based web application over a cellular connection, would the Clientless VPN be any more reliable (connection) then using the android client?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rlambright</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-06T14:17:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Client vs Clientless for Web Application</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/client-vs-clientless-for-web-application/m-p/354324#M472</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For a browser based web application over a cellular connection, would the Clientless VPN be any more reliable (connection) then using the android client?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/client-vs-clientless-for-web-application/m-p/354324#M472</guid>
      <dc:creator>rlambright</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T14:17:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

