<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Way to dual-boot MacOS without violating encryption requirements for GlobalProtect? in GlobalProtect Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/way-to-dual-boot-macos-without-violating-encryption-requirements/m-p/580629#M5138</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm using a 27" i9 iMac running MacOS Monterey 12.7.3 with GlobalProtect VPN 5.2.12–26.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In order to connect with my organization's VPN, GlobalProtect requires my drive be fully encrypted. &amp;nbsp;Normally that's not an issue, as my default is to do so, with FileVault.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, a few months ago I was considering upgrading to Sonoma, and wanted to first test it on separate Container (MacOS's version of a partition) before upgrading my working system from Monterey. &amp;nbsp; Even after ensuring that the Sonoma Container was fully encrypted (or, more precisely, that all relevant Volumes on the Sonoma container were encrypted), I got a message saying I couldn't connect to the VPN because of "Unencrypted Drive(s)". &amp;nbsp;[See screenshot at bottom.] [Note: &amp;nbsp;This is not the actual screenshot from when that happened; I didn't take one, and didn't want to re-install Sonoma just so I could get a screenshot. &amp;nbsp;So I instead generated the error message by connecting an unencrypted external drive.]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I asked my IT dept. why I was getting this message, even though all my Containers are encrypted. &amp;nbsp;They couldn't give me a rigorous technical answer, but said it's known behavior that dual-boot Macs (and possibly dual-boot computers generally—I forget) fail Global Protect's encryption check. &amp;nbsp;I asked them why, and they said they weren't sure, but opined that, when you install a 2nd OS, this creates a Volume or Container that is of a qualitatively different nature than what's present with a single OS (maybe the system needs it to manage multiple OS's?), and that this added Volume/Container is (a) invisible to the user; (b) is not encrypted; and (c) cannot be encrypted.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This seems very strange, since Apple is very good about security and, as far as Apple is concered, my computer is fully encrypted when all Containers/Volumes are encrypted, even with a dual-boot system. &amp;nbsp;So why is GlobalProtect saying it's not?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't know what's going on, but here are some possibilities:&lt;BR /&gt;(a) My computer is not fully encrypted when it's dual-boot, even if I've encrypted all Containers/Volumes, in which case there's a huge hole in Apple's security; or:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(b) My computer is fully encrypted (meaning there are no security vulnerabilties due to to inadequate encryption), in which case GlobalProtect is making a huge error in saying there are security issues with my encryption schema that necessitate blocking my access; or:&lt;BR /&gt;(c) There's nothing wrong with either MacOS or GlobalProtect; the issue is that whoever set up GlobalProtect in my organziation did not configure it properly; or&lt;BR /&gt;(d)&amp;nbsp;There's nothing wrong with either MacOS or GlobalProtect; it's some other 3rd party security application that is making the incorrect determination about my computer's encryption status, and GlobalProtect is simply acting on that info.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thus can someone please tell me what's actually going on, and whether there is a workaround for this that would enable me to dual-boot my Mac and still access my work's VPN?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Global Protect Encryption Issue_redacted_flat.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/58428i920758E06DD82D40/image-size/medium/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Global Protect Encryption Issue_redacted_flat.png" alt="Global Protect Encryption Issue_redacted_flat.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 04:30:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>byte99</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-16T04:30:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Way to dual-boot MacOS without violating encryption requirements for GlobalProtect?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/way-to-dual-boot-macos-without-violating-encryption-requirements/m-p/580629#M5138</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm using a 27" i9 iMac running MacOS Monterey 12.7.3 with GlobalProtect VPN 5.2.12–26.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In order to connect with my organization's VPN, GlobalProtect requires my drive be fully encrypted. &amp;nbsp;Normally that's not an issue, as my default is to do so, with FileVault.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, a few months ago I was considering upgrading to Sonoma, and wanted to first test it on separate Container (MacOS's version of a partition) before upgrading my working system from Monterey. &amp;nbsp; Even after ensuring that the Sonoma Container was fully encrypted (or, more precisely, that all relevant Volumes on the Sonoma container were encrypted), I got a message saying I couldn't connect to the VPN because of "Unencrypted Drive(s)". &amp;nbsp;[See screenshot at bottom.] [Note: &amp;nbsp;This is not the actual screenshot from when that happened; I didn't take one, and didn't want to re-install Sonoma just so I could get a screenshot. &amp;nbsp;So I instead generated the error message by connecting an unencrypted external drive.]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I asked my IT dept. why I was getting this message, even though all my Containers are encrypted. &amp;nbsp;They couldn't give me a rigorous technical answer, but said it's known behavior that dual-boot Macs (and possibly dual-boot computers generally—I forget) fail Global Protect's encryption check. &amp;nbsp;I asked them why, and they said they weren't sure, but opined that, when you install a 2nd OS, this creates a Volume or Container that is of a qualitatively different nature than what's present with a single OS (maybe the system needs it to manage multiple OS's?), and that this added Volume/Container is (a) invisible to the user; (b) is not encrypted; and (c) cannot be encrypted.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This seems very strange, since Apple is very good about security and, as far as Apple is concered, my computer is fully encrypted when all Containers/Volumes are encrypted, even with a dual-boot system. &amp;nbsp;So why is GlobalProtect saying it's not?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't know what's going on, but here are some possibilities:&lt;BR /&gt;(a) My computer is not fully encrypted when it's dual-boot, even if I've encrypted all Containers/Volumes, in which case there's a huge hole in Apple's security; or:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(b) My computer is fully encrypted (meaning there are no security vulnerabilties due to to inadequate encryption), in which case GlobalProtect is making a huge error in saying there are security issues with my encryption schema that necessitate blocking my access; or:&lt;BR /&gt;(c) There's nothing wrong with either MacOS or GlobalProtect; the issue is that whoever set up GlobalProtect in my organziation did not configure it properly; or&lt;BR /&gt;(d)&amp;nbsp;There's nothing wrong with either MacOS or GlobalProtect; it's some other 3rd party security application that is making the incorrect determination about my computer's encryption status, and GlobalProtect is simply acting on that info.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thus can someone please tell me what's actually going on, and whether there is a workaround for this that would enable me to dual-boot my Mac and still access my work's VPN?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Global Protect Encryption Issue_redacted_flat.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/58428i920758E06DD82D40/image-size/medium/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Global Protect Encryption Issue_redacted_flat.png" alt="Global Protect Encryption Issue_redacted_flat.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 04:30:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/way-to-dual-boot-macos-without-violating-encryption-requirements/m-p/580629#M5138</guid>
      <dc:creator>byte99</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-16T04:30:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

