<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Conflict between  Global Protect and RedSky MyE911 application in GlobalProtect Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/conflict-between-global-protect-and-redsky-mye911-application/m-p/1251426#M7336</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/145145839"&gt;@azelenin&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,0"&gt;Just to clarify—adding the RedSky executable to the Exclude Application list is a single change made in the GlobalProtect Gateway configuration on the firewall (not on your clients).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,1"&gt;However, I completely understand the sensitivity of this at your scale.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,1"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,1"&gt;I suggest opening a support case so they can verify if an App Exclusion or a Captive Portal Exception is the best global fix for your specific environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,1"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,1"&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 12:59:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kiwi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-02T12:59:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Conflict between  Global Protect and RedSky MyE911 application</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/conflict-between-global-protect-and-redsky-mye911-application/m-p/1251414#M7333</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;We have&amp;nbsp;thousands computers with installed RedSky&amp;nbsp;MyE911.&lt;BR /&gt;Installation of this app is mandatory on our computers (it is federal low).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We did not have a problem with this app when used Cisco Security Client VPN but now, after installation of Global Protect VPN we have a problem.&lt;BR /&gt;RedSky&amp;nbsp;MyE911 is started automatically (when Windows started), before Global Protect establishes connection.&lt;BR /&gt;As result,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;RedSky&amp;nbsp;MyE911 generates non-stop error (see the picture) which cannot stop even after Global Protect "Connected'.&lt;BR /&gt;For stopping this error our users should exit (close)&amp;nbsp;RedSky&amp;nbsp;MyE911, verify that Global Protect is "Connected" and restart&amp;nbsp;RedSky&amp;nbsp;MyE911 manually.&lt;BR /&gt;It is not a problem with&amp;nbsp;RedSky&amp;nbsp;MyE911 app - this app is working w/o any error on computers with Cisco Client VPN.&lt;BR /&gt;Any suggestion?&lt;BR /&gt;Sincerely,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 10:07:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/conflict-between-global-protect-and-redsky-mye911-application/m-p/1251414#M7333</guid>
      <dc:creator>azelenin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-02T10:07:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Conflict between  Global Protect and RedSky MyE911 application</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/conflict-between-global-protect-and-redsky-mye911-application/m-p/1251419#M7334</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/145145839"&gt;@azelenin&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The root cause is likely how GlobalProtect handles the network stack during the "Connecting" phase compared to Cisco.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I believe there are a couple of things you can try.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Add the RedSky executable&amp;nbsp;to the Exclude Application list.&amp;nbsp; You can do this under&lt;STRONG&gt; Network &amp;gt; GlobalProtect &amp;gt; Gateways &amp;gt; Agent &amp;gt; Client Settings &amp;gt; Split Tunnel &amp;gt; Domain &amp;amp; Application&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alternatively you can tell your OS to enforce a wait time until GlobalProtect is ready before it even tries to start the RedSky service : On Windows, open services.msc, find the RedSky MyE911 service and set the Start Type to Automatic (Delayed Start).&lt;I data-index-in-node="99" data-path-to-node="11,3,0"&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 11:11:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/conflict-between-global-protect-and-redsky-mye911-application/m-p/1251419#M7334</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiwi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-02T11:11:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Conflict between  Global Protect and RedSky MyE911 application</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/conflict-between-global-protect-and-redsky-mye911-application/m-p/1251420#M7335</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately, your&amp;nbsp; solutions are not applicable in our situation.&lt;BR /&gt;We have hundreds thousands computers and according our rules all our computers should have identical configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;We cannot modify settings of all our computers because Global Protect temporary blocks access to Internet.&lt;BR /&gt;I think, Global Protect team should fix this problem - Global Protect app should NOT block access to Internet during start.&lt;BR /&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 11:25:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/conflict-between-global-protect-and-redsky-mye911-application/m-p/1251420#M7335</guid>
      <dc:creator>azelenin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-02T11:25:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Conflict between  Global Protect and RedSky MyE911 application</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/conflict-between-global-protect-and-redsky-mye911-application/m-p/1251426#M7336</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/145145839"&gt;@azelenin&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,0"&gt;Just to clarify—adding the RedSky executable to the Exclude Application list is a single change made in the GlobalProtect Gateway configuration on the firewall (not on your clients).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,1"&gt;However, I completely understand the sensitivity of this at your scale.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,1"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,1"&gt;I suggest opening a support case so they can verify if an App Exclusion or a Captive Portal Exception is the best global fix for your specific environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,1"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,1"&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 12:59:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-discussions/conflict-between-global-protect-and-redsky-mye911-application/m-p/1251426#M7336</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiwi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-02T12:59:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

