<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic OT Devices Default Perdue Level Categorization in IoT Security Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/iot-security-discussions/ot-devices-default-perdue-level-categorization/m-p/1239558#M93</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;How does Palo Alto Device Security categorize OT industrial devices by their perdue levels?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In an OT environment the perdue levels are defined by IEC 62443.&lt;BR /&gt;By the current state of device security only a few industrial devices have been categorized in their "default perdue level"&lt;BR /&gt;Since the predefined custom system attribute can assign perdue levels 0 - 3 by a default value, I like to ask how to create proposals similar to an URL category suggestion in the Device Security platform?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Building the most device filters from scratch is very time consuming and requires a deep inside of the environment.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The expectation of the device security license is to have the right perdue level already defined by the platform.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 14:51:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>O.Rietbrock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-07T14:51:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OT Devices Default Perdue Level Categorization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/iot-security-discussions/ot-devices-default-perdue-level-categorization/m-p/1239558#M93</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How does Palo Alto Device Security categorize OT industrial devices by their perdue levels?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In an OT environment the perdue levels are defined by IEC 62443.&lt;BR /&gt;By the current state of device security only a few industrial devices have been categorized in their "default perdue level"&lt;BR /&gt;Since the predefined custom system attribute can assign perdue levels 0 - 3 by a default value, I like to ask how to create proposals similar to an URL category suggestion in the Device Security platform?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Building the most device filters from scratch is very time consuming and requires a deep inside of the environment.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The expectation of the device security license is to have the right perdue level already defined by the platform.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 14:51:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/iot-security-discussions/ot-devices-default-perdue-level-categorization/m-p/1239558#M93</guid>
      <dc:creator>O.Rietbrock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-07T14:51:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

