<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DNS-base application in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dns-base-application/m-p/508288#M203</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;"dns-base" is one of the subsets of the "dns" application ID. The "dns" application ID is currently being split into to separate subcategories so those who want can filter non-compliant DNS requests:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; dns-base: general DNS requests&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; dns-non-rfc: Non-RFC complaint DNS requests&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can see the descriptions of these application IDs on your PaloAlto under:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Objects -&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; Applications -&amp;gt; search "dns"&amp;nbsp; and then click the dns application names&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;dns-non-rfc was introduced June 21 2022 and is scheduled for activation July 19 2022. You can read more here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/dns-app-id-enhancement-release-plan/ta-p/487590" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/dns-app-id-enhancement-release-plan/ta-p/487590&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If your current Security Policies allow application ID "dns", that will include both subsets. If you only want to allow RFC compliant DNS traffic, then your Security Policy should only allow "dns-base" (non-RFC compliant will be excluded after July 19).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since your current Security Policy set is denying DNS traffic, I would start looking at your current rule to allow "dns" or "dns-base". Is it applied to the correct zones, source/destination addresses, and using "application default" or "any" Service?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;IMPORTANT EDIT:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Re-reading the enhancement release now, there are recent comments that people using "dns" application ID had their Security Policy broken, they had to explicitly add the subset "dns-base" to get DNS working again. See this follow up article with release information:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/customer-issue-impacting-applications-and-threats-content-update/ta-p/506844" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/customer-issue-impacting-applications-and-threats-content-update/ta-p/506844&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 21:31:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Adrian_Jensen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-08T21:31:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DNS-base application</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dns-base-application/m-p/508282#M202</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi ALL,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In our monitor log ,we see a lot of deny for a few PCs with "dns-base" application .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please see below:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditorQui_0" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditorQui_2" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditorQui_3" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Qui_4-1657240524522.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/42181i95B18764E9F95E48/image-size/medium/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Qui_4-1657240524522.png" alt="Qui_4-1657240524522.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;what is "DNS-base" and how do we allow it if needed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;QL&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditorQui_1" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:36:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dns-base-application/m-p/508282#M202</guid>
      <dc:creator>Qui</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-08T00:36:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DNS-base application</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dns-base-application/m-p/508288#M203</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"dns-base" is one of the subsets of the "dns" application ID. The "dns" application ID is currently being split into to separate subcategories so those who want can filter non-compliant DNS requests:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; dns-base: general DNS requests&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; dns-non-rfc: Non-RFC complaint DNS requests&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can see the descriptions of these application IDs on your PaloAlto under:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Objects -&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; Applications -&amp;gt; search "dns"&amp;nbsp; and then click the dns application names&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;dns-non-rfc was introduced June 21 2022 and is scheduled for activation July 19 2022. You can read more here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/dns-app-id-enhancement-release-plan/ta-p/487590" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/dns-app-id-enhancement-release-plan/ta-p/487590&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If your current Security Policies allow application ID "dns", that will include both subsets. If you only want to allow RFC compliant DNS traffic, then your Security Policy should only allow "dns-base" (non-RFC compliant will be excluded after July 19).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since your current Security Policy set is denying DNS traffic, I would start looking at your current rule to allow "dns" or "dns-base". Is it applied to the correct zones, source/destination addresses, and using "application default" or "any" Service?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;IMPORTANT EDIT:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Re-reading the enhancement release now, there are recent comments that people using "dns" application ID had their Security Policy broken, they had to explicitly add the subset "dns-base" to get DNS working again. See this follow up article with release information:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/customer-issue-impacting-applications-and-threats-content-update/ta-p/506844" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/customer-issue-impacting-applications-and-threats-content-update/ta-p/506844&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 21:31:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dns-base-application/m-p/508288#M203</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adrian_Jensen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-08T21:31:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DNS-base application</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dns-base-application/m-p/508442#M212</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We allow "DNS" and port TCP 53 &amp;amp; UPD 53&amp;nbsp; in the security rule but user still complain not working.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we change the rule for "any" service and it is working for them now.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the insight knowledge.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Much appreciated&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dns-base-application/m-p/508442#M212</guid>
      <dc:creator>Qui</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-11T00:31:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DNS-base application</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dns-base-application/m-p/509393#M228</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have come across the same issue. Even if you have the "DNS" application allowed, even though the dns-base is listed as a subset, it will get dropped. I had to allow both "DNS" &amp;amp; "DNS-BASE" and my domain authentication and lookups started to work properly again.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 15:11:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dns-base-application/m-p/509393#M228</guid>
      <dc:creator>kdonohue</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-20T15:11:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

