<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: application based rule in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/application-based-rule/m-p/566488#M2130</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;do you mean that you want to create a rule base using application-id?&lt;BR /&gt;if so you can create the traffic and see the kind of app used and than apply it.&lt;BR /&gt;please know that there is a "depend on" application list, witch means that if you want to allow lets say 'facebook chat' you need to approve '443, facebook' ect..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if you have more questions feel free.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;#####&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i read again your post, if the application is incomplete note that it can caused by:&lt;BR /&gt;1. deny rule that in an other FW in the flow/ the desired server/client isnt responding with a syn-ack - so that the three-way-handshake isnt complete&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. the three-way-handshake did complete but there ware not enough data to distinguish which app the traffic is intended to.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:09:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Major2375</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-21T14:09:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>application based rule</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/application-based-rule/m-p/566480#M2129</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All ,&lt;BR /&gt;We are planning to implement application based rule like under application tab add required app and under service tab add application default.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;However what would be best approach to apply rule where application is showing "incomplete".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Currently we have any any set , so we are planning above steps and don't want to break any on going traffic.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:35:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/application-based-rule/m-p/566480#M2129</guid>
      <dc:creator>DeepakVerma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T12:35:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: application based rule</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/application-based-rule/m-p/566488#M2130</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;do you mean that you want to create a rule base using application-id?&lt;BR /&gt;if so you can create the traffic and see the kind of app used and than apply it.&lt;BR /&gt;please know that there is a "depend on" application list, witch means that if you want to allow lets say 'facebook chat' you need to approve '443, facebook' ect..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if you have more questions feel free.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;#####&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i read again your post, if the application is incomplete note that it can caused by:&lt;BR /&gt;1. deny rule that in an other FW in the flow/ the desired server/client isnt responding with a syn-ack - so that the three-way-handshake isnt complete&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. the three-way-handshake did complete but there ware not enough data to distinguish which app the traffic is intended to.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:09:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/application-based-rule/m-p/566488#M2130</guid>
      <dc:creator>Major2375</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T14:09:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

