<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Shared IP in the WAN Side with HA Active/Active and ARP Load Sharing in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/shared-ip-in-the-wan-side-with-ha-active-active-and-arp-load/m-p/570814#M2304</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Can we confgure the Shared IP in the WAN side in HA Active/Active?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Because I read in the PAN OS Admin guide two things:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Page 410: As illustrated in the floating IP address scenario, the firewall supports a shared IP address&lt;BR /&gt;for ARP load-sharing only on the LAN side of the firewall; the shared IP address cannot be&lt;BR /&gt;on the WAN side.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="PA Shared IP.png" style="width: 852px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/56096iD22BFCBD78AB12E9/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="PA Shared IP.png" alt="PA Shared IP.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the same Guide, page 449:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Use Case: Configure Active/Active HA for ARP Load-Sharing with Destination NAT&lt;BR /&gt;This Layer 3 interface example uses NAT in Active/Active HA Mode and ARP Load-Sharing&lt;BR /&gt;with destination NAT. Both HA firewalls respond to an ARP request for the destination NAT&lt;BR /&gt;address with the ingress interface MAC address. Destination NAT translates the public, &lt;STRONG&gt;shared&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;IP address (in this example, 10.1.1.200)&lt;/STRONG&gt; to the private IP address of the server (in this example,&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.2.200).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The configuration of this use case shown that on the WAN Side, a Shared IP or a Virtual Address is configured.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="PA Shared IP WAN1.png" style="width: 651px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/56097iF983F5412C247D4F/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="PA Shared IP WAN1.png" alt="PA Shared IP WAN1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question, is there any contradiction or something I misunderstood?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 22:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rmeddane</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-25T22:01:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Shared IP in the WAN Side with HA Active/Active and ARP Load Sharing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/shared-ip-in-the-wan-side-with-ha-active-active-and-arp-load/m-p/570814#M2304</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can we confgure the Shared IP in the WAN side in HA Active/Active?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Because I read in the PAN OS Admin guide two things:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Page 410: As illustrated in the floating IP address scenario, the firewall supports a shared IP address&lt;BR /&gt;for ARP load-sharing only on the LAN side of the firewall; the shared IP address cannot be&lt;BR /&gt;on the WAN side.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="PA Shared IP.png" style="width: 852px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/56096iD22BFCBD78AB12E9/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="PA Shared IP.png" alt="PA Shared IP.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the same Guide, page 449:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Use Case: Configure Active/Active HA for ARP Load-Sharing with Destination NAT&lt;BR /&gt;This Layer 3 interface example uses NAT in Active/Active HA Mode and ARP Load-Sharing&lt;BR /&gt;with destination NAT. Both HA firewalls respond to an ARP request for the destination NAT&lt;BR /&gt;address with the ingress interface MAC address. Destination NAT translates the public, &lt;STRONG&gt;shared&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;IP address (in this example, 10.1.1.200)&lt;/STRONG&gt; to the private IP address of the server (in this example,&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.2.200).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The configuration of this use case shown that on the WAN Side, a Shared IP or a Virtual Address is configured.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="PA Shared IP WAN1.png" style="width: 651px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/56097iF983F5412C247D4F/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="PA Shared IP WAN1.png" alt="PA Shared IP WAN1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question, is there any contradiction or something I misunderstood?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 22:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/shared-ip-in-the-wan-side-with-ha-active-active-and-arp-load/m-p/570814#M2304</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmeddane</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-25T22:01:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

