<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco ASA to Palo Alto migration  issue in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/cisco-asa-to-palo-alto-migration-issue/m-p/576176#M2586</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Unless things have changed, migration tool does not create IPSEC tunnels. This is a manual process. PAN does support Policy Based Routing using the "Proxy ID" section. If you can convert to route based policies, I would recommend it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 02:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveKrall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-02-06T02:36:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ASA to Palo Alto migration  issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/cisco-asa-to-palo-alto-migration-issue/m-p/575401#M2559</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i'm working on a new projet where will change the current Cisco ASA firewall by an Palo alto network 440 so we are using Expeditio tool to move the configuration&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;on the existing configuration, our customer use policy based routing to route trafic over both connexion (VPN &amp;amp; Internet)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;this parameter will be present on palo alto after expedition or we have to configure it manually ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:05:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/cisco-asa-to-palo-alto-migration-issue/m-p/575401#M2559</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abdelhak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-01T18:05:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ASA to Palo Alto migration  issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/cisco-asa-to-palo-alto-migration-issue/m-p/575544#M2568</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Palo Alto uses route based VPN's so you might need to reconfigure those separately.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 16:31:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/cisco-asa-to-palo-alto-migration-issue/m-p/575544#M2568</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-02T16:31:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ASA to Palo Alto migration  issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/cisco-asa-to-palo-alto-migration-issue/m-p/576176#M2586</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unless things have changed, migration tool does not create IPSEC tunnels. This is a manual process. PAN does support Policy Based Routing using the "Proxy ID" section. If you can convert to route based policies, I would recommend it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 02:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/cisco-asa-to-palo-alto-migration-issue/m-p/576176#M2586</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveKrall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-06T02:36:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ASA to Palo Alto migration  issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/cisco-asa-to-palo-alto-migration-issue/m-p/576224#M2589</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Could you help how can i configure the options requested options ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:32:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/cisco-asa-to-palo-alto-migration-issue/m-p/576224#M2589</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abdelhak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-06T08:32:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ASA to Palo Alto migration  issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/cisco-asa-to-palo-alto-migration-issue/m-p/576302#M2594</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which options, the VPN tunnels? What manufacturer is the other endpoint?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 18:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/cisco-asa-to-palo-alto-migration-issue/m-p/576302#M2594</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-06T18:08:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

