<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PBR using Route failover in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/583762#M2984</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you talking PBR on the routers or PBF on the firewalls?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 17:15:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rmfalconer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-15T17:15:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PBR using Route failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/583635#M2970</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our organisation purchased two Mpls link and wants to configure an PBR like such&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) All intranet traffic like dns, ntp shoud go via primary MPLS&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) All internet related traffic should go via Secondary MPLS&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) In case Primary MPLS goes down all traffic (intranet and internet) should go via Secondary MPLS and vice versa.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please let me know how i can achieve this. Attached Sample Diagram.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditorvishalrsshah_2" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:08:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/583635#M2970</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishalrsshah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-14T18:08:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR using Route failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/583636#M2971</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;PFA diagram&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:09:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/583636#M2971</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishalrsshah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-14T18:09:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR using Route failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/583762#M2984</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you talking PBR on the routers or PBF on the firewalls?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 17:15:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/583762#M2984</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmfalconer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-15T17:15:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR using Route failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/583765#M2985</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Pbf on firewalls alongwith route redundancy using static route monitoring&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 17:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/583765#M2985</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishalrsshah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-15T17:40:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR using Route failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/583781#M2986</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you really want to use PBF on the PA, you could put RFC 1918 toward primary and negate RFC1918 toward secondary. You'll need a default toward each of them as well for the failover to work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:53:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/583781#M2986</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmfalconer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-15T19:53:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR using Route failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/584156#M3011</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Could you pls elaborate with statement '&lt;SPAN&gt;you could put RFC 1918 toward primary and negate RFC1918 toward secondary'. if possible pls share any relatable link.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;thanks in advnace.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 06:10:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/584156#M3011</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishalrsshah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-18T06:10:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR using Route failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/584236#M3015</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-admin/policy/policy-based-forwarding/create-a-policy-based-forwarding-rule" target="_self"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-admin/policy/policy-based-forwarding/create-a-policy-based-forwarding-rule&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can set destination addresses as part of the policy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pbr-using-route-failover/m-p/584236#M3015</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmfalconer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-18T15:20:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

