<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: OSPF Area Question in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ospf-area-question/m-p/597224#M3706</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response. There is not interface in Area 0 and the existing area is configured as a normal area which I was wondering if I could make another interface in that same area NSSA. I know it can be done with OSPF virtual-link and different area, but was trying to save that.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am asking the question because we tried to just send the default route out the interface in question, but OSPF learns all of the routes in the area.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;-- router area 0/router area 1 --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;-- palo interface 1 area 1/palo interface 2 area 1 --&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;-- router area 0/router area 1 --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;-- palo interface 1 area 1/palo interface 3 area 1 --&amp;gt; trying to make this interface NSSA or just get summary route.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Current thoughts are OSPF virtual-link and new area or switch to BGP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2024 00:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>alexpf</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-07T00:37:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OSPF Area Question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ospf-area-question/m-p/597177#M3698</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you have an area be normal on 1 interface and NSSA on another interface?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Say you have area 1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Area 1 has neighbor on interface 1 with normal type.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can another Area 1 interface be brought online on different interface 2 with NSSA type?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:59:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ospf-area-question/m-p/597177#M3698</guid>
      <dc:creator>alexpf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-06T14:59:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF Area Question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ospf-area-question/m-p/597207#M3704</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't see why not as long as you have a 3rd interface in Area 0.&amp;nbsp; The different Area types represent different LSA types so you will see both LSA types in your LSDB.&amp;nbsp; An interesting question for sure as I've never actually done it.&amp;nbsp; We do run a lot of NSSA areas within our DC.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 19:55:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ospf-area-question/m-p/597207#M3704</guid>
      <dc:creator>M.Anderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-06T19:55:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF Area Question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ospf-area-question/m-p/597224#M3706</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response. There is not interface in Area 0 and the existing area is configured as a normal area which I was wondering if I could make another interface in that same area NSSA. I know it can be done with OSPF virtual-link and different area, but was trying to save that.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am asking the question because we tried to just send the default route out the interface in question, but OSPF learns all of the routes in the area.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;-- router area 0/router area 1 --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;-- palo interface 1 area 1/palo interface 2 area 1 --&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;-- router area 0/router area 1 --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;-- palo interface 1 area 1/palo interface 3 area 1 --&amp;gt; trying to make this interface NSSA or just get summary route.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Current thoughts are OSPF virtual-link and new area or switch to BGP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2024 00:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ospf-area-question/m-p/597224#M3706</guid>
      <dc:creator>alexpf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-07T00:37:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF Area Question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ospf-area-question/m-p/597256#M3709</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Has anybody tried this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2024 23:15:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/ospf-area-question/m-p/597256#M3709</guid>
      <dc:creator>alexpf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-08T23:15:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

