<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA 3200 Virtual Address limit in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-3200-virtual-address-limit/m-p/517133#M464</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Good Day&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The upper limit you hit is platform specific.&amp;nbsp; I am not aware of a simple workaround.&amp;nbsp; Newer/bigger firewall is the obvious answer, but I think you will need to engineer your FW and network differently.&amp;nbsp; Just my perspective.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 15:14:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>S.Cantwell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-07T15:14:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA 3200 Virtual Address limit</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-3200-virtual-address-limit/m-p/516097#M426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi have two PAs in HA Active Active with floating IPs, and today I reach an limit:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;". Error: total virtual addresses 65 exceeded platform maximum 64"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is any workaround for this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:56:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-3200-virtual-address-limit/m-p/516097#M426</guid>
      <dc:creator>DiogoFGoncalves</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-27T16:56:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA 3200 Virtual Address limit</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-3200-virtual-address-limit/m-p/517133#M464</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good Day&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The upper limit you hit is platform specific.&amp;nbsp; I am not aware of a simple workaround.&amp;nbsp; Newer/bigger firewall is the obvious answer, but I think you will need to engineer your FW and network differently.&amp;nbsp; Just my perspective.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 15:14:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/pa-3200-virtual-address-limit/m-p/517133#M464</guid>
      <dc:creator>S.Cantwell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-07T15:14:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

