<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISP Failover with dual Dynamic Public IPs? in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/isp-failover-with-dual-dynamic-public-ips/m-p/519398#M517</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have two ISPs with Dynamic Public IPs.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to setup ISP failover?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:31:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bill-Jerome</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-27T14:31:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISP Failover with dual Dynamic Public IPs?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/isp-failover-with-dual-dynamic-public-ips/m-p/519398#M517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have two ISPs with Dynamic Public IPs.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to setup ISP failover?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:31:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/isp-failover-with-dual-dynamic-public-ips/m-p/519398#M517</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill-Jerome</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-27T14:31:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP Failover with dual Dynamic Public IPs?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/isp-failover-with-dual-dynamic-public-ips/m-p/519489#M519</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/136352"&gt;@Bill-Jerome&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Great question.&amp;nbsp; I don't think it can be done with 1 NGFW because both static route path monitoring and PBF require a next hop to be configured.&amp;nbsp; As I understand your scenario, your default routes are learned dynamically.&amp;nbsp; However, with 2 NGFWs, you could enable Path Monitoring with 1 ISP on each NGFW.&amp;nbsp; If you wanted to load balance between the two, it can be done but would be complicated.&amp;nbsp; Primary/Standby would be the easiest scenario.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is very important that you use multiple Internet IP addresses and set your Failure Condition to all so that if one Internet server goes down you do not fail over.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Edit:&amp;nbsp; How often do your IP addresses change?&amp;nbsp; You could do it with 1 NGFW and update your next hops whenever the IP address changes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000PLL8CAO" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000PLL8CAO&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/9-1/pan-os-admin/policy/policy-based-forwarding/use-case-pbf-for-outbound-access-with-dual-isps" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/9-1/pan-os-admin/policy/policy-based-forwarding/use-case-pbf-for-outbound-access-with-dual-isps&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-web-interface-help/device/device-high-availability/ha-link-and-path-monitoring" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-web-interface-help/device/device-high-availability/ha-link-and-path-monitoring&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 01:36:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/isp-failover-with-dual-dynamic-public-ips/m-p/519489#M519</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-28T01:36:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP Failover with dual Dynamic Public IPs?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/isp-failover-with-dual-dynamic-public-ips/m-p/519492#M520</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the feedback.&amp;nbsp; I was thinking about the next hop option too but was hoping for a way to use a FQDN for the next hop but that seem like wishful thinking.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 03:29:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/isp-failover-with-dual-dynamic-public-ips/m-p/519492#M520</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill-Jerome</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-28T03:29:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

