<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 4-Node Cluster (2x Active/Active) and &amp;quot;orphaned&amp;quot; zone in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/4-node-cluster-2x-active-active-and-quot-orphaned-quot-zone/m-p/997477#M5202</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;I'm looking for some insight into the workings of the multi-node cluster functionality when there are more than two nodes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let's say I have two Active/Active pairs that are clustered with a HA4 Interface.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this case I more specifically wonder how the behavior of session/state synchronization would work if the HA-Pairs had a Zone named differently than the other pair.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;E.g.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HA Pair-1 Zones : Internet, LAN, Zone1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HA Pair-2 Zones : Internet, LAN, Zone2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know what the documentation says, but what happens if this would be the case? Zone1 and Zone2 leads to completely different Networks. Internet &amp;amp; LAN is the same networks and HA4 would sync state/sessions for those, so they're covered.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It kinda hurts my brain just thinking about it, but does anyone have some insight? Maybe you've tried it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:13:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Johande</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-13T17:13:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>4-Node Cluster (2x Active/Active) and "orphaned" zone</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/4-node-cluster-2x-active-active-and-quot-orphaned-quot-zone/m-p/997477#M5202</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;I'm looking for some insight into the workings of the multi-node cluster functionality when there are more than two nodes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let's say I have two Active/Active pairs that are clustered with a HA4 Interface.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this case I more specifically wonder how the behavior of session/state synchronization would work if the HA-Pairs had a Zone named differently than the other pair.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;E.g.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HA Pair-1 Zones : Internet, LAN, Zone1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HA Pair-2 Zones : Internet, LAN, Zone2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know what the documentation says, but what happens if this would be the case? Zone1 and Zone2 leads to completely different Networks. Internet &amp;amp; LAN is the same networks and HA4 would sync state/sessions for those, so they're covered.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It kinda hurts my brain just thinking about it, but does anyone have some insight? Maybe you've tried it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:13:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/4-node-cluster-2x-active-active-and-quot-orphaned-quot-zone/m-p/997477#M5202</guid>
      <dc:creator>Johande</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-13T17:13:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4-Node Cluster (2x Active/Active) and "orphaned" zone</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/4-node-cluster-2x-active-active-and-quot-orphaned-quot-zone/m-p/997563#M5207</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Before going down the A/A rabbit hole, make sure you really want that config, eg requirement for asymmetric routing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-passive-vs-active-active/td-p/68584" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-passive-vs-active-active-recommendations/td-p/290714&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However in either case, the configurations of the two firewalls in the HA will must be identical.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:28:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/4-node-cluster-2x-active-active-and-quot-orphaned-quot-zone/m-p/997563#M5207</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-10T22:28:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

