<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dual ISP setup on 1 virtual router kb issue in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dual-isp-setup-on-1-virtual-router-kb-issue/m-p/1066317#M5377</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/96790"&gt;@TommieVanHove&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you can perform a BGP peering with you, I think you don't need to do the route monitoring.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Olivier&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 02:23:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ozheng</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-14T02:23:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dual ISP setup on 1 virtual router kb issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dual-isp-setup-on-1-virtual-router-kb-issue/m-p/1065775#M5370</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;so I need to setup a dual ISP setup and found below kb. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000PLL8CAO" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000PLL8CAO&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I know there is also one using different virtual routers but for this specific setup it seems this one is a slightly better match. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;however 1 thing in the kb bothers me and in the past when I did this setup I did it slightly different but I'm not sure if it's the best option. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's in regards to the route monitoring config. &lt;BR /&gt;the kb states that you should/can configure the default gateway of the isp as the next hop to monitor. this is fine if the ISP device( router/whatever) onsite goes down or there&amp;nbsp; is an issue with the interface. &lt;BR /&gt;however if the onsite device is fine but the further connection to internet is impacted it won't fail over. &lt;BR /&gt;the router is still responding to the ping, so no issue, all network traffic will time out due to the router's next hop&amp;nbsp; being unreachable.&lt;BR /&gt;(I suspect &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How I "fixed" this in a previous setup was by defining a host route to a specific server over each isp ( in my case both isp also hosted local dns servers that responded to ping. &lt;BR /&gt;so I configured a hostroute to each dns server to always go over 1 isp and then use those for the path monitoring. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;pro: &lt;BR /&gt;I monitor an actual connection that needs to get on the internet and back.&amp;nbsp; not just the next hop. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;con:&lt;BR /&gt;If anyone uses those dns servers for actual dns they will be impacted if one link is down as those routes don't failover.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if those dns servers of one ISP have an issue it will trigger a false failover. &lt;BR /&gt;it's not pretty with those /32 routes. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a better way to do this? or is this the way (despite the con's&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:05:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dual-isp-setup-on-1-virtual-router-kb-issue/m-p/1065775#M5370</guid>
      <dc:creator>TommieVanHove</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-13T08:05:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual ISP setup on 1 virtual router kb issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dual-isp-setup-on-1-virtual-router-kb-issue/m-p/1066317#M5377</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/96790"&gt;@TommieVanHove&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you can perform a BGP peering with you, I think you don't need to do the route monitoring.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Olivier&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 02:23:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/dual-isp-setup-on-1-virtual-router-kb-issue/m-p/1066317#M5377</guid>
      <dc:creator>ozheng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-14T02:23:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

