<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: External virtual network pointing to many internal ip in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/external-virtual-network-pointing-to-many-internal-ip/m-p/1219494#M5499</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/15603"&gt;@Raido_Rattameister&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thank you for response .&amp;nbsp; i have tested it in lab and even in the costumer infrastructure. that worked !&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;FYI.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😊&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 09:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bouthaina</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-05T09:21:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>External virtual network pointing to many internal ip</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/external-virtual-network-pointing-to-many-internal-ip/m-p/1085587#M5393</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are migrating from forcepoint to PA. we face the case below: a virtual network (172.28.66.0/24) is assigned to multiple servers , behind it , there is a group for Such LB in FPT (pointing on 28.66.0 means : one for 172.28.72.2 and 172.28.72.3 for exemple). in PALOALTO, i created DNAT rules for dynamics load balancing between addresses. but , using virtual network that does not exist is posing problem. because all servers are represented as 172.28.66.0 but backend is other networks. how should i declare zones in dnat rules for that virtual network.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 14:45:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/external-virtual-network-pointing-to-many-internal-ip/m-p/1085587#M5393</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bouthaina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-15T14:45:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: External virtual network pointing to many internal ip</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/external-virtual-network-pointing-to-many-internal-ip/m-p/1085597#M5394</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do I understand correctly that you want to use "&lt;SPAN&gt;172.28.66.0" as destination IP in NAT rule on "Original Packet" tab but you don't have any interface inside&amp;nbsp;172.28.66.0/24 zone and no route towards&amp;nbsp;172.28.66.0/24 in routing table?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In this case you need to use UNTRUST (or whatever represents your Internet zone) in NAT policy as in this case Palo matches destination zone based on 0.0.0.0/0 default route.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In Security policy you still use Post-NAT zone as destination (so wherever your&amp;nbsp;172.28.72.x servers are).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 15:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/external-virtual-network-pointing-to-many-internal-ip/m-p/1085597#M5394</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raido_Rattameister</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-15T15:16:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: External virtual network pointing to many internal ip</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/external-virtual-network-pointing-to-many-internal-ip/m-p/1219494#M5499</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/15603"&gt;@Raido_Rattameister&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thank you for response .&amp;nbsp; i have tested it in lab and even in the costumer infrastructure. that worked !&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;FYI.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😊&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 09:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/external-virtual-network-pointing-to-many-internal-ip/m-p/1219494#M5499</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bouthaina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-05T09:21:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

