<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Static route path monitoring using a destination within a different virtual router in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/static-route-path-monitoring-using-a-destination-within-a/m-p/1220019#M5523</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to set up path monitoring for a static route using a destination IP address in a different virtual router?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My scenario is within virtual router 'A' I have a static route with a destination of a NAT range pointing to an interface to get it in to the routing table and then advertising it via BGP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Traffic destined for the NAT IP's get DNAT'd and routed out via virtual router 'B'.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I need to monitor an IP within network 'B' so if it becomes unavailable the path monitor kicks in and withdraws the NAT range from routing table 'A'.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I can get all the routing and security policy working and carry out a ping using an interface IP on virtual router 'A' to a destination IP through virtual router 'B' it responds OK. If I enable path monitoring using the same IP's as my previous ping test the route gets withdrawn even though from CLI the ping still works.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any help would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Paul.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:32:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>${userLoginName}</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-11T15:32:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Static route path monitoring using a destination within a different virtual router</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/static-route-path-monitoring-using-a-destination-within-a/m-p/1220019#M5523</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to set up path monitoring for a static route using a destination IP address in a different virtual router?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My scenario is within virtual router 'A' I have a static route with a destination of a NAT range pointing to an interface to get it in to the routing table and then advertising it via BGP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Traffic destined for the NAT IP's get DNAT'd and routed out via virtual router 'B'.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I need to monitor an IP within network 'B' so if it becomes unavailable the path monitor kicks in and withdraws the NAT range from routing table 'A'.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I can get all the routing and security policy working and carry out a ping using an interface IP on virtual router 'A' to a destination IP through virtual router 'B' it responds OK. If I enable path monitoring using the same IP's as my previous ping test the route gets withdrawn even though from CLI the ping still works.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any help would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Paul.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:32:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/static-route-path-monitoring-using-a-destination-within-a/m-p/1220019#M5523</guid>
      <dc:creator>${userLoginName}</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-11T15:32:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

