<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Are there any cases where certificates are marked as UNKNOWN other than when using CRLs with IDP extension? in Next-Generation Firewall Discussions</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/are-there-any-cases-where-certificates-are-marked-as-unknown/m-p/1220093#M5528</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From the following knowledge, I understand that in CRLs with IDP Extension, certificates not listed in the CRL are marked as UNKNOWN.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PAN-OS Behaviour for CRLs with IDP Extension: Certificate marked Unknown" if not listed in the CRL"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000CldJCAS" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000CldJCAS&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are there cases where the certificate status is UNKNOWN even if the CRL does not use the IDP Extension?&lt;BR /&gt;If there are, I would appreciate it if you could tell me what cases apply.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 01:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Y.Tsushima</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-12T01:42:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Are there any cases where certificates are marked as UNKNOWN other than when using CRLs with IDP extension?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/are-there-any-cases-where-certificates-are-marked-as-unknown/m-p/1220093#M5528</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From the following knowledge, I understand that in CRLs with IDP Extension, certificates not listed in the CRL are marked as UNKNOWN.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PAN-OS Behaviour for CRLs with IDP Extension: Certificate marked Unknown" if not listed in the CRL"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000CldJCAS" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000CldJCAS&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are there cases where the certificate status is UNKNOWN even if the CRL does not use the IDP Extension?&lt;BR /&gt;If there are, I would appreciate it if you could tell me what cases apply.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 01:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/are-there-any-cases-where-certificates-are-marked-as-unknown/m-p/1220093#M5528</guid>
      <dc:creator>Y.Tsushima</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-12T01:42:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

